This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving Prose Court Reporting & Legal Video Services. The correspondence concerns a request to locate the morning session (Volume I) of a deposition transcript from December 4, 2009, in a case titled '[Redacted] vs Epstein'. The sender provides the afternoon version (Volume II) as reference.
This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.
This document is page 8 of a legal filing arguing against a Defendant's subpoena requests, characterizing them as a 'fishing expedition' and an abuse of power. The text specifically highlights 'Request no. 24,' which sought documents regarding Jane Doe No. 3's assertions that she met Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island. The filing argues these requests are irrelevant to the current court action and are being used to gather discovery for a separate federal case (Case No. 0S-SO736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON) involving Alan Dershowitz.
This page is an excerpt from a legal motion filed by Alan Dershowitz, arguing that he must be permitted to share the deposition transcript of 'Roberts' (Virginia Roberts Giuffre) with his legal team, experts, and insurers. The document cites Florida law and previous court cases (Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers) to argue that sealing orders must be the 'least restrictive means necessary' and claims the court has not justified sealing Roberts's transcript. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
A June 10, 2009, article from The Palm Beach Post reporting on legal efforts to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. Attorneys for The Post and victims (including 'E.W.') argue the public has a right to know the details of the 'unprecedented' deal that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges and avoid federal prosecution. The article details the sidebar conference where the deal was originally sealed by Judge Pucillo and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity