This document outlines the terms of a plea agreement for Epstein, where he agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution, requiring him to register as a sex offender. The proposed sentence includes 18 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control, contingent upon judicial approval in Palm Beach County.
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
This document details negotiations and internal communications surrounding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, focusing on the involvement of Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie. Key points include Villafaña's revised NPA which proposed a 30-month sentence for Epstein and included non-prosecution for co-conspirators, and a dispute with Lourie over the inclusion of an immigration waiver for Epstein's foreign national assistants. The document also touches on the USAO's general stance on immigration issues and the reluctance to charge Epstein's accomplices.
This document details communications and disagreements among legal parties regarding victim notification practices and the timing of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing in late 2007. Key figures like Sloman, Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, Starr, and Fisher are involved in discussions concerning the Justice for All Act, the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the proper procedure for informing victims of the case's developments, including objections from defense counsel and directives from prosecutors.
This is a legal close-out sheet for case number 08-9381, detailing the final disposition for defendant Jeffrey Epstein on June 30, 2008. The document indicates Epstein entered a negotiated plea, resulting in a sentence of 6 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control. It also notes that he was designated a sexual offender as part of the case's resolution.
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
This legal document details recollections from a meeting on September 12, 2007, concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Participants, including prosecutors like Lourie and Villafaña and others like Krischer and Belohlavek, discussed the terms of Epstein's plea, specifically whether he would serve an 18-month sentence in a county jail versus a state prison, and which charges he would plead to. The document highlights disagreements and differing memories among the participants regarding the decisions made and the authority to make them.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining the terms for a case against Epstein in Palm Beach County. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and another offense requiring sex offender registration. In return, a binding sentence of 18 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control is recommended, and Epstein waives his right to appeal.
This Palm Beach Police incident report from April 2006 details the acceptance of a plea deal by Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney, Guy Fronstin, resulting in the cancellation of a Grand Jury. The reporting officer expresses strong disapproval of the deal and frustration that the police were not consulted. The report also documents a conflict between the police and the State Attorney's Office regarding who was responsible for notifying the victims that the Grand Jury had been cancelled.
This document is a printout of an Axios article dated April 15, 2019, filed as a court exhibit. It details an interview with Alan Dershowitz in which he admits he is still technically Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer and receives calls from him regarding legal issues, though he denies social contact. The article also references the 'sweetheart plea deal' brokered by Alexander Acosta and the recent Miami Herald investigation into the suppression of the FBI probe.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records, detailing the controversial plea deal negotiations for Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a specific moment where Epstein's attorney, Guy Fronstin, accepts a lenient plea offer (1 count Aggravated Assault, probation, adjudication withheld) from ASA Belohlavek, effectively calling off a grand jury. The narrator, likely a police investigator, expresses strong disapproval of the deal and the lack of consultation, noting that the victims' families were being ignored by the State Attorney's Office.
This document details aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles and defense strategies between 2006 and 2008. It covers charges of aggravated assault, a non-prosecution agreement related to prostitution charges, attempts by Epstein's legal team to discredit prosecutors, and his eventual guilty plea and jail sentence. It also includes an account of Ms. Maxwell contacting an individual about Epstein's investigation and the individual's subsequent refusal to cooperate.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity