| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | The court case United States v. Gaudet, 933 F.3d 11, 15–16 (1st Cir. 2019) is cited as a preceden... | 1st Cir. | View |
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues for the admissibility of Dr. Rocchio's expert testimony regarding delayed disclosure of child sexual abuse. It counters the defendant's argument that the testimony is unreliable by citing Dr. Rocchio's qualifications, academic literature, and the legal precedent set in *United States v. Gaudet*, which authorized similar expert testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity