American Bar Association
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stephen Gillers
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00032918.pdf
This document is a 'Year in Review' email newsletter from Law360 dated December 26, 2019, summarizing major trends, mergers, and judicial confirmations in the legal industry. It includes extensive lists of law firms, companies, and government agencies mentioned in their reporting. The document appears in this collection likely due to the inclusion of the law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' in the list of law firms, which is a keyword match for 'Epstein' but unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein personally.
EFTA00029606.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
EFTA00018373.pdf
Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.
DOJ-OGR-00015249.tif
This document is a list of academic and professional engagements, likely by a single individual, spanning from 1989 to 1993. It details various conferences, lectures, seminars, and organizational affiliations across numerous universities, legal associations, and psychological societies in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe. The entries include the year, event name, and associated institutions or locations.
DOJ-OGR-00015221.tif
This document is a bibliography or publication list detailing numerous psychological research papers, reviews, and book chapters authored or co-authored by E.F. Loftus and various collaborators between 1978 and 1980. The publications primarily focus on memory, eyewitness testimony, and related psychological phenomena, appearing in various academic journals and edited volumes.
DOJ-OGR-00010145.jpg
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of Stephen Gillers, likely submitted as an exhibit in a court case (possibly as an expert witness). It details his legal and public service activities between 1979 and 1992, including roles with the ABA, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, and the David Dinkins Mayoral Transition Search Committee. It also lists his bar memberships in New York and various federal courts. The document bears stamps from multiple court filings, including a 2012 criminal case and a 2022 civil case (likely Guiffre v. Maxwell), and a DOJ production number.
DOJ-OGR-00010144.jpg
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as part of a court case. It details his public lectures, participation in PBS series on ethics and the Constitution, and extensive legal and public service activities. Key activities include holding leadership and member roles in various American Bar Association commissions and being retained by the New Jersey Supreme Court to analyze lawyer disciplinary systems.
DOJ-OGR-00010130.jpg
This document page, filed on April 6, 2012, is part of a legal analysis discussing the ethical obligations of defense lawyers, specifically referencing New York Rules and Rule 11 sanctions. It cites case law (Pennie & Edmonds, Polk County v. Dodson) to establish the standards for 'bad faith' and the role of defense counsel in an adversary system. The text concludes by framing a specific inquiry into whether lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard LLP violated ethical duties by failing to disclose information prior to a letter sent to the Court on July 21, 2011.
DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg
This document is the first page of a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at NYU, filed on April 6, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Gillers outlines his qualifications and states he was asked to address whether attorneys for the firm Brune & Richard met their ethical obligations regarding the disclosure of a 'July 21 letter' and an investigation into 'Juror No. 1.' The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR stamp), though the specific text on this page relates to the Daugerdas tax fraud case rather than explicitly mentioning Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009466.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a curriculum vitae or list of professional activities for Stephen Gillers. It details his public service roles and activities on various legal committees, commissions, and bar associations from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. The document also lists his state and federal bar memberships, including admission to the New York bar in 1968 and the United States Supreme Court bar in 1972.
DOJ-OGR-00009451.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal memorandum or expert report (filed as part of court proceedings in 2012 and re-filed in 2022) analyzing the ethical obligations of defense lawyers. It cites case law regarding the 'adversary system' and specifically questions whether lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard LLP violated ethical duties by failing to disclose information prior to a letter sent to the Court on July 21, 2011. The text discusses the balance between client confidentiality and the duty of candor to the tribunal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017667.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 32 of 78 in the production), produced by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legal and ethical arguments against 'ex parte' subpoenas, arguing they are unfair to victims and violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have notice and the right to be heard before their confidential information is turned over to the defense, citing ABA standards and Supreme Court precedent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017418.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book draft or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and content) discussing the political shift of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the 'hard left' during the 1960s and 70s. It details the author's break with the NLG after it shifted from a liberal human rights organization to a radical leftist group that criticized Israel and supported regimes like Pol Pot's Cambodia. The text specifically highlights anti-Israel rhetoric from Father Daniel Berrigan in 1973 and the takeover of the NLG at the 1971 Boulder convention.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity