Julie K. Brown
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Emily Michot
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Journalist subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Investigative credit |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Announcement of the 2019 Hillman Prize winners. | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-06 | N/A | Publication of 'Lawmakers issue call for investigation of serial sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein's ple... | N/A | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication of Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown | Miami Herald | View |
| 2018-11-28 | Publication | The Miami Herald published an investigative report by Julie K. Brown about Mr. Epstein's 2007 Non... | N/A | View |
| 2018-11-28 | Publication | Publication of a 3-part investigative report in the Miami Herald by Julie K. Brown regarding Mr. ... | N/A | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication of article 'Even from jail, sex abuser manipulated the system'. | Miami Herald | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication of the article 'Perversion of Justice' | Florida | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Miami Herald published investigative report 'Perversion of Justice'. | Miami, FL | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication date of the article | Florida | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication of Miami Herald article 'Even from Jail, Sex Abuser Manipulated the System' | Miami | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Miami Herald publishes 'Perversion of Justice' investigative report. | Miami, Florida | View |
| 2018-11-28 | N/A | Publication of 'Cops worked to put serial sex abuser in prison. Prosecutors worked to cut him a b... | Miami Herald | View |
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
EFTA00023059.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via NPA and failing to ensure victims were notified, he did not commit professional misconduct as defined by clear and unambiguous standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the CVRA litigation by victims, and the subsequent fallout leading to Acosta's resignation and Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
EFTA00015719.pdf
This document is an email dated February 6, 2019, circulating a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article reports that the DOJ, specifically the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), opened an investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the 2008 plea deal granted to Jeffrey Epstein. This investigation was initiated in response to a request by Senator Ben Sasse following the Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series.
EFTA00013359.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in resolving the case via the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, he and his staff did not commit professional misconduct as defined by DOJ standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the secret negotiations, the subsequent violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the eventual fallout leading to Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019.
EFTA00011475.pdf
This document is an Executive Summary of a November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report investigating the 2006-2008 federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the negotiation of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) approved by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta, which allowed Epstein to plead to lesser state charges, and examines the failure of the government to consult with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The report concludes that while Acosta and other attorneys did not commit professional misconduct by definition, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via the NPA and the government failed to treat victims with necessary forthrightness.
EFTA00011115.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that due to 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (including books, podcasts, and documentaries), standard jury selection is insufficient. They request the Court allow individual sequestered voir dire and limited attorney-conducted questioning to identify and remove biased jurors.
EFTA00011096.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00000163.tif
This document details legal proceedings related to Jeffrey Epstein. On February 21, 2019, a district court ruled that the government violated the CVRA by failing to inform victims about a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and misleading them about ongoing federal prosecution. Subsequently, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York indicted Epstein on July 2, 2019, for sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, covering alleged activities from 2002 to 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00023198.tif
This document analyzes the circumstances surrounding a breakfast meeting between Acosta and Epstein's defense counsel, Jay Lefkowitz, on October 12, 2007, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed on September 24, 2007. OPR concludes that Acosta did not make significant concessions during the breakfast meeting, as the key provisions of the NPA, including Epstein's 18-month sentence and sexual offender registration, were established prior to the meeting and not materially altered thereafter. The document also references a Miami Herald article critical of Acosta's involvement.
DOJ-OGR-00023207.tif
This document details an OPR investigation finding no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was a cooperating witness or 'intelligence asset' in federal matters. It concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving a federal investigation against Epstein through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which allowed Epstein to manipulate his sentence conditions and lacked sufficient federal oversight. The document also references media reports and internal discussions concerning rumors of Epstein's cooperation.
DOJ-OGR-00000800.jpg
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000488.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 18, 2019, alleges that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to tamper with witnesses. The Government contends that shortly after the Miami Herald published an exposé on his 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein paid $100,000 and $250,000 respectively to 'Individual I' and 'Individual II', both described as potential co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes. The payments are presented as evidence of an attempt to influence potential witnesses in his ongoing case.
DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021290.jpg
This document describes the conflicting accounts surrounding a breakfast meeting between prosecutor Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz. A letter from Lefkowitz claims Acosta promised the USAO would not interfere with Epstein's state-level plea deal, a claim Acosta's office refuted in an unsent draft letter calling it "inaccurate." The text also details Acosta's later, differing recollections of the meeting and contrasts them with media reports that a secret deal was struck at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00003292.jpg
This document details communications between U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, in late 2007 regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It focuses on a controversial breakfast meeting and subsequent letters where Lefkowitz claimed Acosta promised non-interference by federal authorities, a claim Acosta's office refuted in a draft response as "inaccurate" and tantamount to a "gag order." The text highlights conflicting accounts and the external criticism surrounding Acosta's handling of the case, contrasting his version of events with media reports.
DOJ-OGR-00003182.jpg
This legal document outlines the aftermath of a November 2018 Miami Herald report concerning Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It details a February 2019 court ruling that found the government violated victims' rights, leading to the recusal of the U.S. Attorney's Office. The document then describes Epstein's subsequent federal indictment and arrest in New York in July 2019, and the resignation of government official Acosta following a press conference where he defended his role in the original NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00003026.jpg
This court document outlines the procedural history of the civil litigation between Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell, including deposition dates in 2016 and a settlement in 2017. It details how the USAO-SDNY formally opened its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators in late November 2018, explicitly crediting Julie K. Brown's reporting in the Miami Herald as the catalyst. The document also clarifies that a specific prosecutor, 'AUSA-1', was not involved in opening this 2018 investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005211.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 13, 2021, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The filing argues that Maxwell has been prejudiced by overwhelming negative media coverage, citing Google search result statistics and a list of specific documentaries, podcasts, and books released about her and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts they have not spoken to the media nor contributed to this publicity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.jpg
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein via the address jeevacation@gmail.com). The emails contain significant redactions under privilege, but the visible content is a forwarded Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article details the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recusing itself from the Epstein case and the Department of Justice reassigning the victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.jpg
This document is an email chain dated March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and a recipient identified as 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com). The correspondence is marked 'Privileged' with significant redactions in the message bodies. The visible content consists of a pasted Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown reporting that the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case and reassigned it to Atlanta, following scrutiny involving Attorney General nominee William Barr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017964.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article titled 'Perversion of Justice' by Julie K. Brown, dated November 28, 2018, which details the lenient sentencing and special treatment Jeffrey Epstein received in 2008. It highlights how U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non-prosecution agreement that shelved a federal indictment, allowing Epstein to serve a short sentence in a private wing of a county stockade with extensive work release privileges. The document appears to be filed as a court exhibit in 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017819.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown, filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It reports that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell settled a civil lawsuit with Sarah Ransome, who accused them of sex trafficking her in 2006 and 2007. The article further notes that Ransome alleged she was directed to have sex with Epstein's lawyer, Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017801.jpg
This document is a printout of a November 2018 Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case and marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp. The article details Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 sentencing, where despite facing a potential federal life sentence for abusing underage girls, he received a lenient 18-month state sentence due to a non-prosecution agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta. It highlights the extraordinary privileges Epstein received during incarceration, including work release for 12 hours a day and a private jail wing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018040.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article dated December 19, 2018, filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377). It reports that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell settled a civil lawsuit filed by Sarah Ransome, who alleged she was trafficked by the pair in 2006 and 2007. The article notes that Ransome also accused Epstein's lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, of sexual involvement.
Cops worked to put serial sex abuser in prison. Prosecuto...
Article regarding Epstein referenced as Exhibit A.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity