425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
LocationRelationship Network
065.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', and the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and associated entities) agreed to stay the lawsuit to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program', a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The document is signed by attorneys Brad Edwards (for the plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the defendants).
054.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. It outlines the agreed-upon timeline for the exchange of evidence, including initial disclosures, medical records, and expert reports. The filing identifies the key subjects of discovery as Epstein's alleged torts against the plaintiff, the liability of the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff's damages.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC requests permission to represent Plaintiff 'VE' in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and associated entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC). Henderson certifies her good standing with the Florida bar.
027.pdf
Legal stipulation filed on December 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida, dismissing the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen with prejudice. The document confirms a settlement was reached, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms, and states that each party will bear their own attorney's fees.
025.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.
022.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD). Attorney Bradley J. Edwards requests the court to admit Paul G. Cassell (a member of the Utah Bar) to appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for the plaintiff, identified as M.J., in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document documents the payment of a $75 admission fee and lists the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein from the firm Fowler White Burnett PA.
017-13.pdf
This document is a protective response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe on May 27, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida case against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests the court to promptly order the production of tax returns and other documents that Epstein has withheld on Fifth Amendment grounds, emphasizing that the trial date is set for July 19, 2010. The filing notes that negotiations with Epstein's counsel failed and lists numerous related cases and attorneys involved.
010.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on November 2, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111) by the plaintiff, identified as M.J. The filing strikes two previous certificates of service (DE 5 and DE 6) related to a summons and a subpoena for defendant Jeffrey Epstein due to incorrect filing. The document names Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants and lists contact information for attorneys representing both sides.
040.pdf
A court filing from the Southern District of New York dated November 2, 2020, stipulating the dismissal of a case brought by 'Anastasia Doe' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal is with prejudice and results from the plaintiff resolving her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document is signed by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards (Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (Defendants).
003-02.pdf
This document is a proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York case of Anastasia Doe vs. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order grants attorney Bradley J. Edwards of Edwards Pottinger LLC permission to represent the plaintiff, Anastasia Doe, in this action.
DOJ-OGR-00015113.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 18 of 27) of a legal filing submitted to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Case 1:20-cr-00330. Attorneys Bradley Edwards, Brittany Henderson, and Paul G. Cassell argue for the protection of victim rights under the CVRA, specifically requesting privacy protections and victim participation regarding the release of grand jury materials. The filing date listed in the header is August 6, 2025.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010532.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 190-191), marked as House Oversight evidence. It details the legal aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 guilty plea and the secret non-prosecution agreement signed in September 2007. The text focuses on attorney Bradley Edwards' pro bono lawsuit filed in July 2008, which argued that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by concealing the agreement from victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015611.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 13) of a legal motion filed on April 9, 2015, by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on behalf of non-party Jane Doe No. 3. The filing requests the Court to grant a Motion to Quash or limit the scope of document production and deposition. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity