| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Accuser accused |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kyl
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | Publication of a The Hill article where Sen. Feinstein calls Snowden's leaks an 'Act of Treason'. | N/A | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Congressional Statement by Sen. Feinstein | Congress | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Passage/Discussion of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) | US Congress | View |
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
This document is page 317 of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename and content), containing endnotes for pages 121-129. The text lists bibliographic citations for various articles and reports primarily concerning Edward Snowden, the NSA surveillance leaks, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and government intelligence activities between 2011 and 2016. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019805', indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 42 of 52 from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (vol. 835) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its interaction with Federal Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 615 and Rule 43). The text argues for explicit procedural rules to protect a victim's right to attend trials, referencing the Oklahoma City bombing trial as a failure of the previous system. The document bears the name of David Schoen (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a legal file produced during congressional investigations into the handling of the Epstein case, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights under the CVRA.
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 11 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the necessity of amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 11) to ensure victims' rights are not ignored during plea hearings. It cites the Oklahoma City bombing case as an example where victims were excluded due to rigid adherence to evidence rules. The document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely part of the materials reviewed during the congressional oversight of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the failure to notify victims.
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing specific rights afforded to victims, such as the right to be heard and the right to restitution, and argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must be amended to reflect these statutory rights. The text cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein and references the Oklahoma City bombing case as a catalyst for the legislation.
This document details the legislative history shift from pursuing a constitutional amendment for victims' rights to enacting the Crime Victims' Rights Act due to the lack of super-majority support. It outlines the first three specific rights granted to victims under the Act, including protection, notice of proceedings, and the right not to be excluded from court. Footnotes provide citations to legislative records and statements by Senators Kyl and Feinstein.
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 53 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have the right to be heard on disputed sentencing issues and criticizes the Advisory Committee for not explicitly granting this right. The document was likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to integrate victim rights. It details the author's submission of twenty-eight changes to the Advisory Committee in 2005 and the subsequent limited adoption of these changes by a subcommittee chaired by Judge James Jones. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document contains a log of digital messages from September 20, 2018, between an unknown redacted sender and 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation discusses allegations of sexual misconduct ('grab, grope') in the context of political hearings (likely the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings), referencing Senators Harris and Feinstein. They also discuss political strategy, specifically mentioning the Democrats and the creation of a 'Republican Workers Party'.
This document provides a profile of the U.S. Senate following the 2016 election, outlining the continuation of Mitch McConnell as Majority Leader and the transition of Charles Schumer to Democratic Leader. It speculates on the leadership of key Senate committees for 2017, considering factors like seniority, Republican term limits, and potential appointments to the Trump administration.
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', listing summaries of tax-related articles, court cases, and legislative updates from late 2002 and 2003. The content is exclusively about general U.S. tax law, case precedents, and policy proposals from that era. Although the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was collected during a congressional investigation, it contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, finances, or activities.
This document is page 230 of a larger report, likely from the House Oversight committee, and consists entirely of endnotes or citations. The citations reference news articles, government hearings, books, and legal filings from 2013 to 2017, all focused on the national security implications of the Edward Snowden leaks. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Statement citing the Oklahoma City bombing case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity