MASSACHUSETTS

Location
Mentions
103
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
51
Also known as:
MIT (Massachusetts) Tufts University (Massachusetts) Peabody, Massachusetts Massachusetts Institute of Technology Manchester by the Sea, Massachusetts 01944

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00038380.pdf

This document contains an email chain from December 2019 between the FBI (NY office) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves a request for subpoenas directed at Uber and Lyft to obtain account records associated with Ghislaine Maxwell, her phone number, and email address. The emails also request checks on accounts associated with specific addresses in Boston, MA, and Manchester-by-the-Sea, MA.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00037706.pdf

This FBI email from July 2, 2020, summarizes intelligence linking Ghislaine Maxwell to a property in Bradford, NH, and a mansion in Massachusetts. The analysis connects Maxwell to Scott Borgerson and Adam Ghander through a web of LLCs (Angara, Granite Realty, Tidewood) and a law firm (Nutter, McLellen & Fish), noting a $20 million transfer from Maxwell to an entity named Angara.

Fbi email / intelligence summary
2025-12-25

EFTA00037653.pdf

A CJISWeb printout generated by the Massachusetts State Police on December 10, 2019, detailing the Massachusetts driver's license record for Ghislaine Noelle Maxwell. The document confirms her license status was 'ACTIVE' at that time, with an issue date of September 27, 2018, and an expiration date of December 25, 2022. Personal identifying information such as specific addresses, DOB, and SSN are redacted.

Law enforcement record (cjisweb printout)
2025-12-25

EFTA00035669.pdf

An email correspondence from July 2019 involving a Captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. The email confirms that attorney Martin Weinberg has been verified as being in good standing in Massachusetts and is authorized to visit inmate Jeffrey Epstein, likely in response to issues with counsel meeting the client.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00035549.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. US Attorney's Office (USANYS) personnel are coordinating to resolve an issue where Epstein's attorney, Martin Weinberg, was denied entry to the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to meet his client because he is barred in Massachusetts (out-of-state). The emails confirm Weinberg's good standing and grant permission for the visit ahead of Epstein's indictment presentment scheduled for the following day.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00035547.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. It details urgent communications between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and likely prison or DOJ officials regarding Epstein's detention at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The emails concern Epstein's attorney, Martin Weinberg, being denied entry to the MCC to visit his client before the next day's indictment because he was an out-of-state attorney from Massachusetts; officials subsequently verified his standing to allow the visit.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00035025.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, between staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The correspondence confirms that Martin Weinberg has been verified as an attorney in good standing in Massachusetts and is explicitly permitted to visit inmate Jeffrey Epstein.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00033579.pdf

This document is an internal email from a Captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center dated July 7, 2019. It confirms that Martin Weinberg has been verified as an attorney in good standing in Massachusetts and is authorized to visit inmate Jeffrey Epstein.

Email / internal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00032964.pdf

This document is a New York Law360 email newsletter dated October 10, 2018, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job openings. It includes headlines about lawsuits involving Harvard and NYU law reviews, a suicide of a former Goldman Sachs aide, and various commercial litigation cases. The document mentions 'Epstein' only in the context of a job listing for the law firm 'Epstein Becker & Green, PC'; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.

Email newsletter
2025-12-25

EFTA00032732.pdf

This document is an email newsletter from White Collar Law360 dated June 17, 2021, providing summaries of various legal news stories. Key articles include updates on Biden's anti-corruption push, a Russian oligarch client of Greenberg Traurig, and a specific report on Ghislaine Maxwell complaining about prison conditions, including 'raw sewage' and guards monitoring her legal calls. The document also lists numerous law firms, companies, and government agencies involved in current legal proceedings.

Email newsletter (white collar law360)
2025-12-25

EFTA00032549.pdf

This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated January 14, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a lawsuit filed by Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig against The New York Times for defamation, claiming the paper falsely implied he defended taking donations from Jeffrey Epstein. Other stories include the Bridgegate Supreme Court case, the Harvey Weinstein trial, and various fraud and corruption cases.

Email newsletter
2025-12-25

EFTA00032459.pdf

This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter dated October 1, 2018. It summarizes various legal and corporate news stories, including the Deutsche Bank Libor trial, Elon Musk's SEC settlement, an emoluments suit against Donald Trump, and the Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination. The document lists numerous law firms and companies in its sidebars, including 'Epstein Becker Green', which is likely the reason for its inclusion in this collection, though it refers to a law firm and not Jeffrey Epstein personally.

Email newsletter (law360 white collar)
2025-12-25

EFTA00030767.pdf

This document is a Public Policy Law360 email newsletter dated July 20, 2021, summarizing various legal and policy news stories. Crucially, it includes a report that Ghislaine Maxwell owes the New York State Tax Department nearly $1.6 million, identifying her as a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Other topics include the confirmation of Tiffany Cunningham as a Federal Circuit judge, a potential $30M fine for Robinhood, and various other legislative and judicial updates.

Public policy law360 newsletter (email)
2025-12-25

EFTA00030281.pdf

This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 15, 2019. The top stories focus on Jeffrey Epstein's legal battles, specifically highlighting that potential child pornography found in his home could derail his bail bid, and federal allegations that he paid $350,000 to influence witnesses. The newsletter also covers various other legal developments involving SunEdison, L'Oreal, Donald Trump's financial subpoenas, and various corporate lawsuits.

Email newsletter
2025-12-25

EFTA00029606.pdf

This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

Email newsletter (law360)
2025-12-25

EFTA00027410.pdf

This document contains notes from a February 1, 2021, call between the SDNY US Attorney's Office and Dr. Lisa Rocchio, a forensic psychologist. The notes outline Dr. Rocchio's professional qualifications and her expertise on topics relevant to sex trafficking cases, including grooming, delayed reporting, trauma bonding (referred to as attachment), and memory encoding. Dr. Rocchio confirms she has not treated any Jeffrey Epstein victims but agreed to notify prosecutors if any contact her for civil litigation assistance.

Call notes / memorandum
2025-12-25

EFTA00026434.pdf

This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from April 4, 2019, summarizing various legal and political developments. Key topics include Senate rule changes for judicial nominees, the release of the Mueller Report, and a budget hearing where Labor Secretary Alex Acosta defended his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein sex crime case. The newsletter also covers antitrust cases, environmental rulings, and the 'Varsity Blues' college admissions scandal court appearances.

Email newsletter / legal news digest
2025-12-25

EFTA00017823.pdf

This document is a letter motion dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense requests an in camera conference and permission to file a renewed bail motion under seal to protect the identities of family and friends acting as sureties, citing severe harassment and death threats (including social media examples). The letter mentions a financial report by Macalvins Limited. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter on the same day, stating she saw no basis for sealing the letter itself and ordered the defense to justify the sealing request by December 2, 2020.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-12-25

EFTA00010105.pdf

This document is a letter motion dated November 18, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests a ruling that the birth certificates of Minor Victims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 be deemed self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and 902(4), thereby avoiding the need to call records custodians from various states (RI, MO, NY, CA, MA) to testify at trial. The defense had refused to stipulate to the authenticity of these records despite having no reason to doubt them.

Legal correspondence / motion
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00017903.jpg

This document is page 30 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic psychologist, who testifies about their professional background, explaining that they provide independent evaluations for both prosecution/plaintiff and defense sides. Dr. Rocchio confirms holding psychology licenses in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001852.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated November 25, 2020. The defense argues for sealing the identities of sureties and third parties (including children) due to severe safety concerns, citing graphic social media death threats against Ghislaine Maxwell as evidence of the danger. The document also references a financial report by Macalvins Limited covering Maxwell's finances from 2015-2020 and cites legal precedents regarding the presumption of public access versus privacy interests.

Legal filing / letter to the court (page 2 of 4)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001122.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 26, 2020, details numerous violent threats made against Ghislaine Maxwell on social media. It argues that the intense and threatening media attention, fueled by conspiracy theories like QAnon and Pizzagate, made it impossible for her to live a quiet life and forced her to separate from her spouse and leave her home for safety. The document includes direct quotes of the threats and a statement from her spouse describing the terrifying environment.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000431.jpg

This is a legal letter dated July 16, 2019, from attorney Marc Fernich to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case of US v. Epstein. The letter serves to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail by countering the government's arguments for detention made in court the previous day. Fernich argues that the government's position relies on a remand presumption connected to 18 USC § 1591, which Epstein's defense contends does not apply to the core conduct at issue.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg

This document is page 32 of a 40-page court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the legal standard for 'implied bias' regarding jurors, specifically rejecting the argument that a juror must be presumed biased simply for having personal experiences similar to the issues at trial. The court cites Second Circuit precedents (Daugerdas, Torres, Brown, Garcia) to support the conclusion that implied bias is a narrow category reserved for extreme situations, such as deliberate lying to get on a jury, rather than merely shared experiences.

Court order / legal opinion (page 32 of 40 from case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009969.jpg

This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of 'United States of America, v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. The page lists numerous words and proper names (such as McCarthy, McDonough, and Massachusetts) and provides the page and line numbers where they can be found in the full transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009969.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity