The document is a transcript of a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a witness. The judge questions the witness about whether the presence of a third party can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors and asks for specific literature to support the witness's claims about how perpetrators build trust.
The document is a transcript of a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a witness. The judge questions the witness about whether the presence of a third party can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors and asks for specific literature to support the witness's claims about how perpetrators build trust.
The Court asks the witness to clarify their expert opinion, stating it as 'the presence of another individual can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors' and asking if that is correct.
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Carolyn, about a previous deposition answer where she denied having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms the previous answer but then provides a detailed clarification.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects and instructs the witness not to answer if their knowledge comes from privileged conversations.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects and instructs the witness not to answer if their knowledge comes from privileged conversations.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace page where their age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and that stating their age as 18 was a lie, prompted by the platform's age restrictions.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace page where their age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and that stating their age as 18 was a lie, prompted by the platform's age restrictions.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about her awareness that people were looking for her. The witness admits she knew people were looking for her at her job at Quarterdeck and describes an incident where she and a friend switched name tags. Mr. Leopold, acting as counsel, objects to a question from Mr. Tein, calling it harassment.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their mother's husband, Paul, had contact with reporters or received money from them. The witness is also questioned about their knowledge of a Detective Recarey, a potential deal against Epstein, and Epstein's house. The witness denies knowledge of all these matters. Mr. Leopold, likely the witness's attorney, makes an objection.
This document records a portion of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness. Mr. Leopold, an attorney, instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege, which leads to a dispute between the two attorneys over speaking objections.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about lying to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they lied about being 18 and told Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about lying to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they lied about being 18 and told Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity