Unidentified Male ('He')
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Trump
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unidentified female (16-year-old)
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Strained dependent |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00007689.pdf
This document is a handwritten phone message slip found in an evidence bag (dated 04-15-05). The message is for Jeffrey from 'Jean-Luc' (likely Jean-Luc Brunel), dated April 4, 2005, at 6:21 PM. The content is bizarre and possibly coded, relaying information from a doctor about 'symptoms' described as 'bratislavian various' (possibly 'variola' or a code). The message warns that the condition can be cured if he moves, but otherwise could cause 'impothy' (likely a misspelling of 'impotency' or 'atrophy') of the muscle and 'shorten your sex life'.
DOJ-OGR-00013669.jpg
This document is page 78 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that Ghislaine Maxwell had no involvement in the logistics, funding, or encouragement of Farmer's trip to New York. The witness confirms she had no knowledge of, communication with, or contact with Maxwell prior to arriving in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013515.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony establishes Rodgers' employment history starting in 1991 and tracks the employer's (contextually Jeffrey Epstein) movements between New York residences, specifically a property on 69th Street and the move to the 9 East 71st Street townhouse in 1996.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018595.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay or blog post included in a House Oversight evidence dump (labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018595). The text discusses the intersection of feminism, BDSM, and cultural imperialism, referencing an interaction at a Post Office and a blog post by a writer named 'Trinity.' It explores arguments regarding whether specific sexual preferences are innate or symptoms of societal oppression/patriarchy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027771.jpg
This document is a log of electronic messages (likely iMessage or similar) exchanged on June 13, 2019, between an individual using the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' and a redacted sender. The conversation discusses an unidentified male described as an attorney and a 'major dick' who is allegedly providing information to 'biden.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027726.jpg
This document contains a forensic extraction log of five messages sent on May 26, 2019, from the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The messages discuss geopolitical events, including the departure of 'May' (likely Theresa May), Iraqi opposition to Iran sanctions, and the reaction of an unnamed male figure ('He') who the sender claims will view the situation as 'employees against mgmt'. The document is marked with a House Oversight Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027606.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged between March 21 and March 22, 2019. The conversation is between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). They discuss an unidentified male described as a 'legend' and 'super smart,' contrasting him with Noam Chomsky, while also mentioning scheduling and 'the emblem of the movement.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027334.jpg
This document is a digital forensics log containing a message thread from July 2018 between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted sender. The conversation discusses a third party who needs rest and a new Chief of Staff (avoiding a 'Washington swamp monster'), mentions an individual named Stanley, notes someone's presence in St. Louis, and includes an obscure request to 'Bring along the bicycle pump.' The document originates from House Oversight Committee records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027253.jpg
This document is a log of electronic messages from October 2017 involving the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation concerns a debrief of a formal meeting in Washington D.C. involving 'Witt OBrien people' where the subject reportedly lacked data to justify numbers. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027239.jpg
This document is a digital message log from April 20, 2017, detailing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss an unidentified male subject associated with NIH and Johns Hopkins who is 'looking for his next gig.' Epstein asks to Skype the individual, but the redacted sender suggests an in-person meeting in NYC, describing the subject as 'a character.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027190.jpg
This document is a forensic log of text messages exchanged on February 26 and 27, 2017. The messages depict a sender expressing emotional distress and reliance on the recipient, discussing a third party ('he') who is described as demanding of the sender's time and presence to a detrimental degree. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight investigation (027190) and lists the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' at the bottom.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027187.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of text messages from February 2017, likely involving Jeffrey Epstein (via the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation includes a shared article about healthcare technology (HIMSS), a cryptic comment about someone needing help because their 'advisory are not what he deserves,' and an emotional statement 'I'm not strong enough to fight them.' The exchange concludes with the redacted sender asking if Epstein is in NYC on the 2nd, to which he replies 'nope'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027135.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of a message log dated January 27, 2017, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual discussing 'Bannon' and 'Barrack' as 'puppet masters.' The conversation also references an unidentified male who wishes to speak with Epstein but is prevented from doing so by his wife.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015348.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript, essay, or article discussing sexual themes in media and comedy. It references Sarah Silverman's stand-up, a censorship controversy involving a comic strip by John Crawford, and an incident on CNN involving author Hugh Prather. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is part of an evidence collection, likely related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, though neither is explicitly mentioned in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013538.jpg
This document appears to be page 38 of a memoir or report, likely by a medical professional (possibly Dr. Arnold Mandell, though not explicitly named on this page) associated with the San Diego Chargers between 1971 and 1975. The text details the use of graphology (handwriting analysis) to evaluate the personalities of NFL players and correlate personality types with success in specific football positions. The page also contains a preceding paragraph discussing personality traits associated with different types of musicians.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025490.jpg
This document is a message log from June 5, 2019, marked with a House Oversight footer. It details a conversation between a redacted sender and 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) discussing a 'London trip,' a news article about Steve Bannon and Trump, and a reference to sworn testimony. The participants comment on the news story as a 'stone cold lie' and describe an unidentified male as 'punch drunk' and having a 'gleam in his eye.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025487.jpg
This document is a log of text messages from June 5, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. They are critically discussing a male public figure's recent media appearance, noting that he is being 'pummeled' by 'female talking heads' and the BBC, and predicting his book will be a failure ('a stiff'). The tone suggests the subject is appearing weak and defensive.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.jpg
An email thread between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) from September 19-20, 2014. They discuss a complex decision related to Ruemmler's housing in New York and a salary situation, with Epstein advising her to contact 'Eric' for data. Ruemmler mentions that 'He was there' (referring to a third party) and notes that rent exceeds the monthly salary discussed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.jpg
An email thread from September 19, 2014, between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation). They discuss Ruemmler's potential plans, housing costs in NY relative to salary, and the religious background of a 'Gov'. Epstein advises Ruemmler to wait until Sunday to gauge her feelings and to call 'Eric' for data.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025735.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee containing an exchange on August 25, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses an unnamed male figure ('He') whom they describe as 'drunk with power' and a 'moron,' while simultaneously dismissing 'lefrac' and 'Roth' as '3rd rate.' The exchange suggests the redacted individual is someone the subject 'fears.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025734.jpg
This document is a digital forensic record of an iMessage conversation from August 25, 2018, between 'jee' (associated with jeeitunes@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. They discuss a 'crisis' involving a third-party male ('he') who is unaware of the severity of the situation, with 'jee' noting that a 'serious group' is worried and understands the players involved. The conversation mentions an 'intervention' and implies the subject is talking to people he normally communicates with but fails to grasp the situation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity