| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Eppolito, 543 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2008) | 2d Cir. | View |
This document is a page from a court filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 29, 2022. The Court denies the Defendant's Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal, which was made at the close of the Government's case. The text outlines the legal standard for such a motion, citing numerous precedents that require the court to view evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.
This legal document is a page from a court filing analyzing whether two conspiracy counts (Count Three and Count Five) against a defendant should be considered a single conspiracy. The analysis focuses on the 'Korfant' factors, specifically the overlap in time, similarity of operations, and the roles of participants like Sarah Kellen. The document argues that the complete overlap in time periods and similarity in the methods of abuse favor the Defendant's position that there was only one conspiracy.
This document is page vii from a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated June 29, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing various legal cases with the United States as the plaintiff. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation (including the court and year), and the corresponding page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity