The Daily Mail
OrganizationRelationship Network
009.pdf
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
DOJ-OGR-00021532.jpg
This legal document discusses a discrepancy between a juror's (Juror 50) responses on a questionnaire and subsequent public statements. Juror 50 denied being a victim of a crime on the questionnaire but later told media outlets, including The Independent and The Daily Mail, on January 5, 2022, that he had been sexually abused as a minor. Based on these contradictory statements, the Court has decided to hold an evidentiary hearing to investigate the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00009131.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is an argument against a defendant's motion for a new trial. It cites legal precedent to establish the high standard for granting such motions and uses statements from 'Juror 50' to The Daily Mail to demonstrate the jury's deliberation process was diligent and fair. The juror's account is presented as evidence that the verdict was based on a methodical review of the evidence without undue pressure, thereby undermining the defendant's motion.
DOJ-OGR-00009810.jpg
This document is a legal filing by the government arguing against a defendant's motion for a new trial. It cites legal precedent establishing a high bar for granting new trials and uses statements made by 'Juror 50' to The Daily Mail to demonstrate that the jury's deliberations were thorough, methodical, and proper. The government contends that the juror's account shows the verdict was based on evidence and not external pressures or improper considerations.
DOJ-OGR-00009549.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court order filed on February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Court orders an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether 'Juror 50' committed misconduct by failing to disclose a history of sexual abuse and being a crime victim on jury selection questionnaires (Questions 48 and 25). The order cites interviews Juror 50 gave to The Independent and The Daily Mail in January 2022 where he admitted to being abused, which contradicts his sworn jury questionnaire responses.
DOJ-OGR-00008798.jpg
The U.S. Department of Justice submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that a juror has given multiple press interviews, revealing that he was a victim of sexual abuse and asserted that he "flew through" the juror questionnaire. The government brings these statements to the court's attention as they may have implications for the integrity of the jury selection process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity