William JULIÉ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Olivier Laude
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defense expert support |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Ministry
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Expert witness for defense |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal analysis | Analysis of whether the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell meet the dual criminality requirement f... | France | View |
| N/A | Legal analysis | Analysis of the likely outcome of a hypothetical extradition request by the USA to France for Ghi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal analysis | The document outlines the French extradition procedure and analyzes the likely outcome of a poten... | France | View |
| N/A | Legal argument | The document presents a legal argument that Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell would not be able to successful... | France | View |
| 2021-05-23 | Legal filing | Document 1702 was filed in case 20-cr-00830-AWI. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-23 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 103 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal analysis | William Julié wrote a response to the US government's memorandum concerning extradition. | Paris | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal filing | William Julié wrote a response to the US government's memorandum regarding a defendant's motion f... | Paris | View |
| 2020-12-14 | Legal analysis | Analysis of factors influencing the likelihood of the French government extraditing Ms Ghislaine ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002141.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié regarding the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from France to the USA. The filing argues that under the US-France Extradition Treaty, a claim of political motivation is unlikely to succeed in preventing her extradition, citing a history of French courts granting US requests and distinguishing her case from a past instance where extradition to Russia was denied on political grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00002140.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell in the context of French law for an extradition request. The document argues that the alleged conduct would qualify as the crime of 'proxénétisme' (procuring) under the French Criminal Code, with enhanced penalties because it involved a minor. The author concludes that the principle of dual criminality would not be an obstacle to Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA.
DOJ-OGR-00002138.jpg
This document is a legal opinion by attorney William Julié analyzing the potential outcome of an extradition request from the United States to France for Ghislaine Maxwell, should she flee there. The analysis focuses on the general bars to extradition under French law, particularly the requirement for French courts to consider human rights violations in the requesting state. The author concludes it is highly unlikely that French authorities would refuse to enforce an extradition decree for Maxwell, despite her French citizenship.
DOJ-OGR-00002137.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, authored by attorney William Julié. It describes the procedural step of making a potential application to the European Court of Human Rights against France once all domestic legal options have been exhausted. The document also notes the possibility of requesting interim measures, such as suspending an applicant's extradition, pending the court's decision.
DOJ-OGR-00002136.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It states a key procedural requirement from the 1996 US-France Extradition Treaty, specifying that a person subject to an extradition decree must be handed over within one month of notification.
DOJ-OGR-00002134.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, by attorney William Julié, outlines the fourth stage of the French extradition process. It details the procedure when a requested person consents to extradition, referencing specific articles of the French Code of Criminal Procedure and international agreements, such as the extradition treaty between the EU and the USA. The document explains how consent allows for a simplified and expedited surrender, including a potential waiver of the rule of specialty.
DOJ-OGR-00002132.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Authored by French attorney William Julié, it outlines the procedures of the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, specifically detailing the 60-day limit for formal extradition requests following an arrest and the 'Ministerial phase' of the application process. It explains that if documents are not received within 60 days, the detained person is discharged, though they may be re-arrested later.
DOJ-OGR-00002130.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié and filed on December 14, 2020, provides a background on the bail hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 14, 2020. It highlights the US Government's argument and the Court's decision to deny bail, both of which centered on Maxwell's French citizenship and France's policy of not extraditing its nationals, which established her as a flight risk. The report's stated purpose is to legally evaluate the validity of the claim that France does not extradite its citizens.
DOJ-OGR-00002129.jpg
This document is a table of contents for a legal analysis prepared by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the steps of the French extradition procedure and analyzes the potential outcome of an extradition request from the United States for Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on French law and the extradition treaty between the two countries.
DOJ-OGR-00002128.jpg
This document, part of a legal case filed on December 14, 2020, is a legal opinion from attorney William Julié regarding extradition procedures. It outlines the roles of the Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Chamber, and explains that while there is no specific timeframe for a final government decree, the process can be expedited to a few weeks if the request is deemed urgent.
DOJ-OGR-00002127.jpg
This legal document, authored by French attorney William Julié, provides an analysis of the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. Julié argues that despite her French citizenship, French authorities would likely grant an extradition request because the US-France extradition treaty does not prohibit extraditing nationals. He further states that factors like her US citizenship, a signed waiver, and the obligation for France to try her if extradition is denied, make her return to the USA highly probable, especially in a scenario where she had fled in violation of bail.
DOJ-OGR-00002126.jpg
This document is a legal opinion written by French attorney William Julié regarding the extradition of French nationals to the United States. It was requested by Olivier Laude on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to support bail proceedings, arguing that French law permits extradition to the US and that Maxwell intends to waive her rights to fight such extradition in French courts. The document serves to assure US authorities that Maxwell would not be shielded by French non-extradition principles if she were released on bail and fled to France.
DOJ-OGR-00002006.jpg
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William Julié (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00020122.jpg
This document is a legal opinion filed in December 2020 (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case), authored by French lawyer William Julié. It argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of its nationals to the US, citing the 'Peterson case' and a 2010 EU-US agreement. The document specifically references Ghislaine Maxwell, concluding it is unlikely France would refuse to extradite her, and quotes a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama supporting discretionary extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00020121.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It analyzes the extradition treaty between France and the USA, arguing that France has the discretion to extradite its own citizens. The text specifically rebuts a DOJ argument based on the 2007 'Hans Peterson' case (involving Senators Obama and Durbin), stating that the Peterson outcome was a discretionary ministerial decision rather than a binding judicial precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00020115.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Document 102) outlines arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team refuting the government's claim that she is a flight risk. The defense argues that her use of a trust and pseudonym to buy a home was for protection against harassment, not to hide, and emphasizes her willingness to waive extradition rights to France and the UK. It also addresses conflicting expert opinions regarding whether France would extradite her, contrasting expert William Julié's report with a general letter from the French Ministry of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00020107.jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed Dec 23, 2020). It lists two exhibits: an addendum opinion by Julié concerning France and an addendum opinion by Perry concerning the U.K. This filing is associated with the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00020048.jpg
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William Julié, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
DOJ-OGR-00002798.jpg
This document is the final page (Page 18 of the filing, internal page 6) of a legal opinion submitted by French attorney William Julié in US Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues that under French law (specifically Article 696-4), individuals who have lost their French nationality are not protected from extradition, citing precedents where the French government deported such individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00002797.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated March 23, 2021. It argues that France can legally deport individuals who have been stripped of their French nationality, using the case of Djamel Beghal as a primary example. Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen convicted of terrorism, was deprived of his French citizenship to facilitate his deportation to Algeria, a move intended to circumvent ECtHR prohibitions on removal to countries with a risk of torture.
DOJ-OGR-00002795.jpg
This page is an excerpt from a legal filing by French attorney William Julié in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues that French laws prohibiting the extradition of French nationals should be interpreted strictly and should not apply to individuals who are no longer French nationals at the time of the request. It specifically cites Article 3 of the Treaty and Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, arguing these laws are designed to prevent offenders from fraudulently acquiring citizenship to escape extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00002794.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.
DOJ-OGR-00002793.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum authored by French attorney William Julié on March 14, 2021, filed in the US case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides a legal opinion countering the French Ministry of Justice's stance, arguing that if Maxwell were to renounce her French citizenship (which she stated she is prepared to do), the French government would be legally entitled to extradite her to the US. The memo specifically refutes a March 9, 2021 letter from Philippe Jaeglé of the French Ministry of Justice regarding the non-extradition of nationals.
DOJ-OGR-00002784.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Doc 171) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 23, 2021. It argues procedural points regarding jurisdiction and bail appeals, and substantively argues that Maxwell's offer to renounce her French citizenship is a valid condition for release. The defense contests the US government's reliance on a French Ministry of Justice letter regarding extradition, citing a counter-opinion by French counsel William Julié.
Expert opinion on French extradition law regarding Ghisla...
The report (Julié Rep.) reviews the French extradition process and clarifies that extraditing a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
Expert Report on Extradition
States it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.
Expert opinion on French extradition law regarding Ghisla...
The report (Julié Rep.) reviews the French extradition process and clarifies that extraditing a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
Likelihood of French government refusing to extradite Ms....
An expert report stating it is 'highly unlikely' that the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.
Extradition likelihood
Stating it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.
French Extradition Law
Argues the government's stance on French extradition law is incorrect.
Exhibit A
Argues the government's assertion on French extradition law is incorrect.
Additional opinion on the extradition of nationals by the...
No preview available
Additional opinion on the extradition of nationals by the...
Legal arguments regarding French extradition laws and renunciation of nationality.
Additional opinion on the extradition of nationals by the...
Legal opinion arguing that the French government can legally execute an extradition request against an individual who renounces nationality.
Response to the government's memorandum in opposition to ...
This document, authored by William Julié, refutes the US government's interpretation of French extradition law, arguing that international treaties supersede the national code cited in the Minister of Justice's letter.
Response to the government's memorandum in opposition to ...
This document itself is a communication, providing a legal analysis of French extradition law to counter the arguments made in the US government's memorandum.
Response to the government's memorandum in opposition to ...
No preview available
Response to the government's memorandum in opposition to ...
A legal analysis by William Julié arguing that the US government's interpretation of French extradition law is flawed because it ignores the supremacy of international treaties over domestic law.
Request for legal opinion
Instruction to draft an opinion regarding French extradition procedure and the possibility for Maxwell to be extradited from France to the USA.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity