| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986-01-01 | Legal case | The case of United States v. Melendez-Carrions, where Judge Feinberg argued that due process limi... | 2d Cir. | View |
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the pretrial detention conditions for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, are 'untenable' and prevent her from adequately preparing for trial. The filing cites legal precedents, including United States v. Jackson and United States v. Melendez-Carrions, to assert that prolonged pretrial detention under such circumstances constitutes unconstitutional punishment and violates due process.
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, likely a brief, arguing that the pretrial detention conditions of a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, are untenable and amount to unconstitutional punishment. The author cites several legal precedents (Stephens, Weigand, Jackson, Melendez-Carrions) to support the claim that her inability to properly review discovery and the prolonged nature of her detention violate due process, especially given the government is seeking a life sentence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity