Mariann Meier Wang
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Client |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 15
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs (Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, Davies)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Submission of status update letter to the Court | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-03-20 | N/A | Original deadline for Plaintiff's opposition papers | SDNY | View |
| 2020-03-16 | N/A | Stipulation agreed and signed by attorneys for both parties | New York, New York | View |
054.pdf
A status update letter dated November 2, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs have registered with the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the cases remain stayed pending resolution through that program.
051.pdf
A status update letter dated August 14, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs are currently presenting their claims to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the court cases remain stayed pending the outcome of this alternative dispute resolution process.
047.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in June 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Teala Davies against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The stay was requested to allow the plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation for resolving sexual abuse claims. Judge Debra C. Freeman signed the order on June 22, 2020, and directed the parties to submit a status report by August 14, 2020.
029.pdf
A legal letter dated March 16, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman in the case Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter requests a one-week extension for briefing deadlines regarding a motion to dismiss, citing disruptions caused by COVID-19 response measures. Opposing counsel Bennet J. Moskowitz consented to the request.
028.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed in the Southern District of New York for the case of Teala Davies v. The Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn). Dated March 16, 2020, it establishes protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, including medical records and financial information, and sets procedures for inadvertent disclosures and sealing documents. It includes a Non-Disclosure Agreement form (Exhibit A) to be signed by third parties accessing confidential information.
020.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated February 6, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding discovery schedules in three lawsuits (Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Davies) against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs advocate for standard discovery timelines (120 days), while the Defendants (Co-Executors Indyke and Kahn) request longer periods (140-160 days) citing the complexity of managing over twenty pending cases against the Estate. The letter also touches on the status of settlement discussions in the Davies case, noting that the voluntary compensation program has not yet been approved.
019.pdf
A letter from plaintiff's attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the case of Davies v. Indyke et al., dated January 27, 2020. The letter proposes a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss. Judge Freeman endorsed the letter with a handwritten order on January 28, 2020, directing counsel to provide an update on settlement discussions before the court sets a briefing schedule.
018.pdf
A letter dated January 27, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter seeks clarification on procedural requirements following the referral of the case and proposes a briefing schedule for the Defendants' motion to dismiss, with dates ranging from February to March 2020. It references prior court filings from January 21 and January 22, 2020.
005.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 22, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 19 Civ. 10788). The plaintiff, Teala Davies, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacity as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons directs Indyke to respond to the complaint within 21 days and lists his attorney as Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP.
003.pdf
This document is a 'Summons in a Civil Action' filed on November 21, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10788). The plaintiff, Teala Davies, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons is addressed to Indyke via his attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz and requires a response within 21 days.
Status Update on Indyke cases
Letter informing the court that plaintiffs have registered claims with the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requesting the cases remain stayed.
Status Update for cases 19-cv-10653, 19-cv-10758, 19-cv-1...
Status update informing the court that plaintiffs are seeking resolution through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requesting the cases remain stayed.
Re: Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
Request for one-week extension of briefing deadlines due to COVID-19 response measures.
Proposed discovery schedule for Doe/Davies v. Indyke cases
Joint letter proposing discovery schedules and outlining disagreements between Plaintiffs and Co-Executors regarding timelines.
Re: Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
Proposal for briefing schedule and request for clarification regarding pre-motion letters.
Re: Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
Proposal for briefing schedule and clarification on pre-motion letter requirements regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity