Dennis Donahue
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
all defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting between all defense counsel and Dennis Donahue. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Discussion | A discussion about the 2010 suspension opinion related to Catherine M. Conrad. | Presumably at court, in the... | View |
| N/A | Discussion | A discussion about the 2010 suspension opinion concerning Catherine M. Conrad took place. The wit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection / Voir Dire preparation | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Voir Dire (Jury Selection) | District Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 268, Exhibit A-5725) filed on August 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding strategies used during jury selection (voir dire). Brune confirms utilizing Google, a database, the Nardello firm, and Dennis Donahue to research potential jurors to find those sympathetic to defense themes.
DOJ-OGR-00010001.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal team's preparation for jury selection (voir dire). The questioning focuses on the timeline and handling of key documents, including a juror list, questionnaires, research from the Nardello firm, and a specific '2010 suspension opinion' concerning Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms the opinion was discussed in the presence of jury consultant Dennis Donahue before or during the voir dire process.
DOJ-OGR-00009334.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on the jury selection (voir dire) process, specifically what Ms. Brune knew about a prospective juror and whether she shared that information with other defense counsel. Ms. Brune confirms that all defense counsel met with a Dennis Donahue before the jury was selected and explains why she discarded certain information as not relevant to the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009329.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a trial attorney named Brune. Brune discusses the strategy for jury selection, which involved identifying sympathetic jurors and using research tools like a database and Google. Brune confirms hiring the Nardello firm and the involvement of Dennis Donahue to assist with these jury research efforts.
DOJ-OGR-00009322.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding preparations for jury selection (voir dire). The questioning focuses on the timeline of receiving information, including a juror list, research from the Nardello firm, and a 2010 suspension opinion concerning Catherine M. Conrad. Brune clarifies that the opinion was discussed on the morning of court in the presence of jury consultant Dennis Donahue, rather than definitively before the start of voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00009317.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony focuses on the staffing of Brune's legal team, identifying Nancy as a paralegal, Ken Renta as the managing clerk responsible for filings, and Dennis Donahue as a jury consultant hired specifically for the case who was present during voir dire. The document is part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated February 24, 2022.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity