This document contains an email exchange dated August 12, 2019, two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. A Captain Secretary from USP Leavenworth emails a Captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York—where Epstein died—simply stating, 'Hey, Just checking on you.' The MCC Captain replies thanking them for the concern.
This document is an email chain from July 2, 2020, between the Chief of the Criminal Division at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a recipient named 'Ed'. The correspondence confirms the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire on charges of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors. It discusses procedural details, including that her presentment will not be in SDNY that day and that any appeal on the bail argument would go to Judge Nathan.
A photograph of a BlackBerry mobile phone screen displaying a contact entry for 'Daniel Siad'. The specific contact details, including a mobile number, an 'other' number, and an email address, have been obscured with black redaction bars. The document includes an evidence identifier 'EFTA00017957' in the bottom right corner.
This document is an internal email chain from July 2, 2020, involving the Chief of the Criminal Division at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence confirms the unsealing of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell and her arrest in New Hampshire that morning. The emails discuss the logistics of the announcement occurring before a holiday weekend during the pandemic.
This document is an email thread from September 2008 between Jeffery Edwards (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and an unidentified female recipient. The conversation takes place while Edwards is incarcerated (referred to as 'confinement' and 'vacation'). The recipient, currently in New York, conveys well-wishes and a crude joke from a mutual male acquaintance, while Edwards requests photos to be sent to him.
An email thread from September 2008 between Jeffery Edwards (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses the email user's 'confinement' (likely Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration, potentially using Edwards' name or account) and includes requests for photos, jokes about contraband/Vaseline, and an offer for a visit. The correspondent mentions being in New York with another redacted individual.
This document is an email chain from July 12-14, 2019, between defense attorney Reid Weingarten and Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding the case U.S. v. Epstein. The correspondence begins with the government filing its reply in support of detention and opposing bail. Subsequent emails discuss scheduling a meeting between counsel, with Weingarten mentioning his visit to Epstein ('the client') at the jail on the evening of July 14th.
This document is an email chain between employees of the USAFLS (likely US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) dated November 20, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Response to Florida Bar Complaint,' indicating a legal challenge against one of the attorneys. The sender requests a colleague to PDF the document and send it to a personal Hotmail account, notes that a judge continued a hearing, and ends with a personal 'I luv u,' suggesting a close relationship between the parties.
This document contains an email thread from December 12, 2007, discussing Jeffrey Epstein. One individual offers to send an 'indictment package on Epstein' to another, who declines stating they already have it. The identities of the correspondents are redacted.
This document is an email thread from December 9-10, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney and another individual regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence discusses whether Epstein had responded to a legal matter, with one party confirming they are creating PDFs of the responses. The thread concludes with a discussion about one party traveling to the other's location ('coming up here').
An email chain from November 7, 2007, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. The attorney asks a colleague if there is news from the defense, State Attorney, or Judge Davis, and reports a concerning development where private investigators have approached girls who were not part of the state's case against Epstein. The recipient replies simply with 'No.'
An email chain from September 21, 2007, involving attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez attempting to finalize a plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Sanchez emails a vacationing official claiming they are ready to sign, but internal emails between (presumably) prosecutors or DOJ officials express confusion and dismissal, stating Sanchez has 'not been in any negotiations' and referring to her as 'yet another cook.'
This document is page 10 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 3, which strictly prohibits jurors from using social media, the internet, or electronic devices to communicate about the case or conduct outside research during deliberations. The instruction emphasizes that the verdict must be based solely on evidence presented in the courtroom.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
An email thread from July 23, 2018, between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.'). Epstein offers to organize meetings for Bannon with 'leaders of countries' in Europe but insists Bannon must visit in person for 8-10 days rather than working remotely. Bannon discusses a film project referred to as 'American Carnage,' claiming Ari Emmanuel financed it and that it has been accepted to the Venice, Toronto, and New York film festivals.
This document is an email chain from July 2018 between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). The conversation originates from a news snippet sent by Benjamin Harnwell about Bannon launching a populist foundation ('The Movement') in Brussels. Epstein advises Bannon that operating in Europe requires significant physical presence ('face time and hand holding') rather than remote management, and they exchange references to Dante's Inferno ('9th circle', 'Abandon Hope').
This document is an email chain from July 2018 found in House Oversight files. Steve Bannon forwards an email he received from Benjamin Harnwell to Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The content is the text of a news article detailing Bannon's plans to launch 'The Movement' in Brussels to unite right-wing populist leaders in Europe to compete against George Soros and influence the 2019 European elections.
This document is an email chain from January 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Reid Weingarten. They discuss an individual referred to as 'Stevie boy,' noting his erratic behavior ('all over the place') and a grand jury subpoena he received. Epstein mentions inviting this individual and 'Wolff' to his birthday lunch, noting the individual agreed pending a 'tea party conference schedule.'
An email chain from May 27-28, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein ('jeffrey E.') and Nicholas Ribis. The conversation begins with Epstein stating 'getting hotter,' leading to a discussion involving 'Jarred' (likely Jared Kushner) and 'DJT' (Donald Trump). The exchange involves attempts to coordinate a phone call, with Epstein asking for Ribis's number and Ribis suggesting times to talk.
This document is an email chain from May/June 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation) and Nicholas Ribis. The primary discussion concerns comments made by 'Donald' alleging that Epstein betrayed him 15 years prior by refusing to help with a lawsuit. Ribis responds that 'Donald' is making these claims to 'discredit or downgrade' Epstein with a third party.
An email chain from May 27-28, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (signed as 'jeffrey E.') and Nicholas Ribis. The conversation begins with Epstein commenting 'getting hotter,' followed by Ribis replying with speculation about 'Jarred' (likely Jared Kushner) and 'DJT' (Donald Trump). The rest of the thread consists of attempts to coordinate a phone call. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email thread from May-June 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Nicholas Ribis. Epstein asks Ribis for insight regarding a claim by 'Donald' (likely Donald Trump) that Epstein 'betrayed him 15 years ago' by refusing to help with a lawsuit. The thread also includes logistics for scheduling calls and a potential visit.
This document is an email thread from May/June 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and Nicholas Ribis. They are attempting to coordinate a phone call while Ribis is attending a wake. The most significant content is Epstein asking Ribis for insight regarding a claim by 'Donald' (likely Donald Trump) that Epstein betrayed him 15 years prior by refusing to help with a lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity