This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
This document is an email chain from June 25, 2019, among officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), including Audrey Strauss and Geoffrey Berman. The correspondence concerns a recent Epstein hearing, sharing a Miami Herald news article about it, and requesting the circulation of 'NDGA's papers'. The final email suggests a follow-up meeting to discuss specific items related to the hearing.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This document is page 5 of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense on March 23, 2021, arguing for bail. It proposes retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. as an independent monitor for Maxwell's and her spouse's assets, specifically including proceeds from the sale of her London home, to address the Court's flight risk concerns. The defense argues against the government's claims of 'lack of candor,' citing the harsh conditions (solitary confinement, suicide watch) Maxwell was under when questioned by Pretrial Services.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on September 3, 2019. Epstein's defense counsel argues to the judge that Epstein's suicide on August 10 was 'implausible' given the pending legal motions scheduled for August 12, including a bail appeal and document production requests. The counsel also asserts that the initial autopsy findings on August 11 were inconclusive and reiterates the defense stance that the New York prosecution violated the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
This document is Page 5 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Government is failing to meet discovery obligations, specifically regarding 28 boxes of material from Florida and files from Georgia, and that the proposed timeline impairs Maxwell's ability to prepare for the July 2021 trial. The text highlights concerns about witness statements, the age of the claims (26 years), and the difficulty of securing out-of-country testimony.
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 171) from March 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing for bail release conditions. The defense proposes appointing retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. to monitor Maxwell's and her spouse's assets, specifically including proceeds from the sale of her London home. The text counters government arguments regarding Maxwell's 'lack of candor' by noting she was questioned by Pretrial Services while under extreme conditions including solitary confinement and suicide watch.
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, is a news or policy article discussing the Obama administration's higher education initiatives, specifically the 'College Scorecard' and a 'Datapalooza' event held on October 9. It details proposed metrics for college ratings, including graduation rates and alumni earnings, and mentions a $1 billion 'Race to the Top' incentive fund proposal. The text highlights President Obama's support for competency-based degrees and online learning, referencing specific universities like Southern New Hampshire University, University of Wisconsin, and Carnegie Mellon.
This document is page 162 of a manuscript, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text appears to be written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by the claim of being the clerk who drafted the 'Rudolph' opinion for Justice Goldberg). It discusses the legal history of the death penalty for rape, specifically the backlash from the Georgia Supreme Court against federal intervention, scholarly criticism from Herbert Packer, and the subsequent formation of a litigation project by the ACLU and NAACP.
This document is page 6 of an itinerary/schedule, seemingly for the delegation of the Maldives during a UN General Assembly session (likely 2012). It details meetings, speeches, and receptions involving the President, Foreign Minister, and staff, including an event hosted by Hillary Clinton and the President of Malawi. The document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity