Trove
Sign In Sign Up
You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

John W. Gillis

Person
Mentions
7
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017760.jpg

This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the inherent power of courts to appoint counsel for indigent victims. It cites various legal precedents (such as Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co.) to argue that victims require legal representation to ensure a fair process, as neither prosecutors nor defendants prioritize victim rights. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted by Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) as part of congressional inquiries or legal arguments regarding victim representation.

Legal research/law review article (exhibit)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613.jpg

This document appears to be Page 10 of a legal filing or article (Excerpt from 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically citing the 'In re Dean' (BP Products) case to argue that victims have rights to confer with the government before charges are formally filed or plea deals are reached. While Epstein is not named on this page, the legal argument mirrors the controversy surrounding the failure to notify victims during Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement.

Legal analysis / law review excerpt (submitted as exhibit)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014052.jpg

This document is page 73 of a legal publication (dated 2014) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that victims have rights before charges are filed, citing the case 'In re Dean' and the BP Products explosion case in Texas as precedent for victims' rights to confer with the government regarding plea deals. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named on this page, the text cites Paul G. Cassell (a lawyer for Epstein's victims) multiple times, and the legal arguments regarding plea deals made without victim consultation mirror the controversy surrounding Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement.

Legal publication / law review article
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search