This document is a letter filed on August 4, 2025, from an anonymous victim of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Richard M. Berman. The victim criticizes the DOJ and FBI for allegedly prioritizing the protection of high-profile individuals—including the President—over victims, questions the narrative of Epstein's suicide, and requests a third-party review of files to ensure victim anonymity. The document also quotes a DOJ statement confirming Epstein harmed over 1,000 victims but asserting that no further disclosure of evidence is warranted.
This document is a Federal Bureau of Prisons 'Pretrial Inmate Work Waiver/Notice of Separation' form signed by Jeffrey Epstein (identified by Reg. No. 76318-054) on July 8, 2019. In Section II, Epstein acknowledges potential contact with convicted inmates and indicates (by circling 'am not') that he is not aware of any reason why such contact would pose a threat to his safety. In Section IV, he signs a waiver volunteering for work assignments beyond basic housekeeping tasks. The staff signatures witnessing the document are redacted.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
This document is an email from Jean James to Geoffrey Berman dated August 7, 2019, which contains the text of a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made by Mark Taylor to the UK House of Commons. The FOI request seeks copies of emails allegedly leaked to the Daily Mail in 2015, which purportedly showed Jeffrey Epstein attempting to blackmail Parliament into accepting his friend Jes Staley as CEO of Barclays. The request also references reports that Staley visited Epstein in prison and on his private island via yacht.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
Page 206 of a legal transcript featuring an exchange between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. Blanche questions Maxwell on whether she believes outside actors arranged for Epstein's death in prison to silence him regarding 'people he knew.' Maxwell denies this theory, stating she does not believe in the blackmail theories or that there was a 'hit' on him, suggesting instead that if it was murder, it was an 'internal situation' within the prison system.
This document is a page from a transcript of a deposition or interview involving Ghislaine Maxwell and attorney Todd Blanche. Maxwell explicitly states she does not believe Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. When asked who might have killed him if the blackmail allegations were untrue, she explains that in prison, a 'hit' can be purchased for as little as $25 worth of commissary.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the U.S. Government's description of inmate Ms. Maxwell's prison conditions is false. It counters claims of amenities by detailing harsh realities such as sleep deprivation from guards' actions, solitary confinement, unsanitary conditions, and inadequate resources for trial preparation. The filing asserts the government's information is based on unreliable, multi-layered hearsay from prison staff to the prosecutor.
This legal document is a filing by Mr. Robertson's defense team arguing against the government's motion for reconsideration of his pretrial release. The defense contends that continued detention, especially with COVID-19 restrictions in jails, prevents the necessary in-person meetings required to build trust and adequately prepare for trial, thereby infringing on his right to a fair trial. They assert that his release is essential for the preparation of his defense.
A page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney. The attorney argues that the government's citations of 'dangerousness cases' are irrelevant to Maxwell's situation and emphasizes the impossibility of preparing for trial while Maxwell is detained during the COVID-19 crisis, citing lack of in-person access to the client due to BOP restrictions. The Judge attempts to interject at the bottom of the page.
This document is page 63 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement delivered in court following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker describes the lasting trauma of Epstein's abuse, expresses anger at the prison system for allowing Epstein to commit suicide (thereby denying victims their day in court), and concludes by reclaiming their identity as a survivor rather than a victim.
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten addresses the court regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that prison employees falsified information and ignored orders never to leave Epstein alone. Weingarten states that despite the medical examiner's conclusion of suicide by hanging, the defense has received medical evidence suggesting the injuries were more consistent with assault.
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between August 18 and September 2, 2020. It details various motions and orders, specifically Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to unseal victim identities and be moved to the Bureau of Prisons' general population. The docket also records attorney appearances for the prosecution and procedural filings regarding protective orders and sealing requests.
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring victim impact statements. It includes the conclusion of one statement promising vigilance against the perpetrator, followed by Ms. Ransome beginning her statement describing how she was recruited by a woman named Natalya after moving to New York to attend FIT. The text also acknowledges written submissions from other victims including Maria Farmer and Ms. Helm.
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attempts to discredit a witness named 'Kate' by highlighting her history of substance abuse, her involvement in tabloid stings, and her continued affectionate contact with Jeffrey Epstein (including emails signed 'Best love always') while he was in prison and she was in her thirties. The defense argues this behavior is inconsistent with that of an abuse victim.
This document is a news article from the Daily Mail, filed as a legal exhibit, detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty expresses his satisfaction with the guilty verdict, stating the jury was convinced Maxwell was 'every bit as culpable' as her associate Epstein. He affirms that the prosecution proved its case 'beyond reasonable doubt' and that justice was served for the victims.
This legal document, dated April 1, 2021, argues that Ms. Maxwell is being subjected to unconstitutional and inappropriate treatment by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The author claims this treatment, which includes sleep deprivation, inedible food, and unnecessary suicide watch, is a direct result of the death of Epstein and is preventing Ms. Maxwell from adequately preparing for her trial. The charges against her are noted to be from 1994-1997 and involve three anonymous accusers.
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of an individual named Shawn, filed on August 10, 2022. Shawn testifies about his criminal history, admitting to a 2015 arrest in Louisiana for methamphetamine possession and a 2017 arrest in Florida for being a felon with a firearm, for which he served three years in prison. He states he was released in August 2020, has not been arrested since, and currently works as a salesman.
This document is the final page of a victim impact statement related to the court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 25, 2022. The author contrasts Maxwell's 25 years of a privileged life with their own decades-long feeling of being imprisoned by trauma. The author concludes by stating that Maxwell must be imprisoned so that her victims can finally be free.
This document is a character reference letter written by Harriett Jagger to Judge Alison J. Nathan on May 5, 2022, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell. Jagger describes a 45-year friendship beginning at school when they were 15, characterizing Maxwell as kind, engaging, and supportive during Jagger's personal hardships, such as a marital separation. Despite acknowledging Maxwell's conviction, Jagger affirms her unchanged support and regular correspondence with Maxwell during her imprisonment.
This document is an index (concordance) page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It lists words alphabetically from 'petition' to 'product' alongside their frequency and specific page/line citations within the full transcript. The document includes references to legal terms (plaintiff, plead, probation), generic terms, and the acronym 'PMD' (likely referring to the defendant, Paul M. Daugerdas).
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 1, 2021, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that statements made to the media by defense appellate counsel, Mr. Markus, violate Local Rule 23.1. The filing specifically cites a recent Op-Ed where Markus compared his client's case to Bill Cosby's, arguing these extrajudicial comments are designed to prejudice potential jurors and interfere with a fair trial. The Government asserts that relief is warranted to prevent further prejudicial statements.
This document is a page from a DOJ report analyzing factors contributing to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, citing his loss of status, estrangement from family, and fear of prison life. It outlines institutional recommendations regarding single celling and rounds, and notes that the staff's effort to treat him 'the same as other inmates' may have caused them to overlook specific risk factors associated with sex offenders. It specifically details his placement in the SHU on July 7, 2019, and an email sent to Associate Warden Shirley Skipper-Scott on July 25, 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity