Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Chrysler Capital Corp.

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017891.jpg

This document is page 826 from the 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It appears to be part of a judicial opinion in the case 'Burnett I' (likely Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp.), concerning liability for the September 11 attacks. The text discusses legal standards for 'proximate cause,' 'concerted action liability' (conspiracy/aiding and abetting) under New York law, the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), and civil RICO claims. It analyzes whether providing material support to al Qaeda creates liability for the 9/11 attacks. While the Bates stamp indicates it was produced to the House Oversight Committee, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.

Legal opinion / case law (federal supplement)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017880.jpg

This document is page 815 of a court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) from the S.D.N.Y. dated 2005. It details allegations that Prince Mohamed, as CEO of DMI (Dar al-Maal al-Islami Trust), provided financial support and banking services to al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through institutions like Faisal Islamic Bank and Al Shamal Islamic Bank. The text discusses jurisdiction arguments and lists specific terrorist events (1993 WTC bombing, 1998 embassy bombings, 9/11) as part of a common scheme. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.

Legal document (court opinion/order)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017870.jpg

This document is page 805 from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765), specifically regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' in the S.D.N.Y. It outlines the legal standards for establishing personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants based on a 'conspiracy theory' under New York law (C.P.L.R. ยง 302(a)(2)). The text cites numerous precedents to explain that plaintiffs must prove a corrupt agreement, an overt act, intentional participation, and resulting damage to link a defendant to a conspiracy committed in New York. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely included in an investigation file to establish legal precedent for jurisdiction over entities involved in complex conspiracies, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.

Legal opinion / court case reporter page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search