Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Third District

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
Third District Court Florida's Third District Court of Appeal
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00010249.pdf

This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated April 24, 2019, detailing a legal victory for Jeffrey Epstein. A Florida appeals court ruled that Jean-Luc Brunel's modeling agency, MC2, failed to properly serve Epstein with a lawsuit because they served his business address rather than his primary residence on Little St. James. The article also references the wider context of Epstein's legal history, including the 2007 plea deal involving Alexander Acosta and allegations connecting Brunel to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Email forwarding a law360 news article
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013314.jpg

This document is page 11 of a legal filing titled 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment.' It argues that Epstein's voluntary dismissal of previous claims against Edwards constitutes a 'bona fide termination' of proceedings, supporting Edwards' counterclaim for malicious prosecution. The text asserts that Epstein dismissed his claims on the eve of a hearing because he knew he lacked probable cause and verifiable evidence.

Legal pleading (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013312.jpg

Page 9 of 15 from a legal filing in the case of Edwards vs. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document argues that the 'litigation privilege' should not protect Epstein from claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process because his actions were malicious, unfounded, and targeted the Plaintiff's counsel without a legitimate judicial goal. It distinguishes Epstein's actions as an individual party from legal precedents involving attorneys.

Legal document (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search