Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Susan Estrich

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016546.jpg

This document is page 37 of a legal filing submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (indicated by the footer). The content is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) containing footnotes 178-187, which discuss the history of sexual assault legislation, the backlog of untested rape kits, the evolution of 'rape shield' laws, and the efficacy of specialized prosecution units for sexual crimes and prison abuse. While the text discusses general legal precedents and statistics regarding sexual assault, its submission by Schoen suggests relevance to a specific investigation, likely regarding the handling of sexual abuse cases.

Legal filing / evidence submission (law review excerpt)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg

This document is page 19 of a legal text (likely a law review article or legal memorandum by David Schoen) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo, arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed to prevent 'secondary victimization.' The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a legal precedent where the court ruled that the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application.

Legal journal article / congressional document production
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014065.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a law review article (likely by Paul Cassell) included in a House Oversight Committee production regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victims' rights should apply during the investigative stage (pre-charging) to prevent 'secondary victimization.' This legal argument is central to the controversy surrounding the Epstein non-prosecution agreement, where victims were not notified during the federal investigation.

Legal/academic article (law review) produced in government oversight investigation
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search