This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript of a book or memoir by Ehud Barak (indicated by the header 'BARAK' and context). It recounts a private meeting at Laurel Lodge with President Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright immediately following the collapse of the 2000 Camp David Summit. The text details the emotional atmosphere, the strategic pivot regarding the official communiqué, and Clinton's assurance that he would support Barak's decision to halt the 'Wye redeployments' in light of Arafat's rejection of the peace deal.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir (likely by Ehud Barak, given the header) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It details high-stakes negotiations with Bill Clinton at Laurel Lodge (Camp David) regarding the status of Jerusalem, the Temple Mount, and potential concessions to Yasser Arafat for a peace agreement. The text outlines specific proposals concerning administrative control in East Jerusalem and the village of Abu Dis.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript by Ehud Barak (indicated by the header), recounting the 2000 Camp David Summit negotiations. It details a tense interaction where President Clinton became angry with Palestinian negotiator Abu Ala'a, followed by an overnight 'make-or-break' negotiation session at Laurel Lodge involving Shlomo Ben-Ami and Gili Sher. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was produced during a congressional investigation, likely due to Barak's associations with Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not mentioned in this specific text.
This document page appears to be a draft from Ehud Barak's memoir (indicated by the header / BARAK /) recounting the 2000 Camp David Summit. The text details political maneuvering regarding a negotiation paper on Jerusalem and personal interactions, including a dinner where Barak sat next to Chelsea Clinton and a subsequent informal meeting with Yasser Arafat arranged by Yossi Ginossar. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity