Trove
Sign In Sign Up

D. Me.

Location
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
District of Maine (D. Me.)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008842.tif

This document is a legal correspondence or motion from Matthew A. Leish, an attorney for Daily News, L.P., requesting the unsealing of documents related to Ms. Maxwell's effort to obtain a new trial. It cites several legal precedents regarding public access to court documents, particularly in post-conviction proceedings and cases involving juror misconduct, arguing for transparency due to the strong presumption of openness and the public interest.

Legal correspondence / motion
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005636.jpg

This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 29, 2021. It is a legal argument seeking to exclude the testimony of an expert witness named Rocchio, arguing that her opinions on 'grooming' and sexual abuse are based on unverified personal beliefs rather than scientific methodology or representative studies. The text cites various legal precedents (including Supreme Court rulings) to support the claim that Rocchio's testimony is unreliable and 'virtually impregnable for purposes of cross-examination.'

Legal filing (court brief/motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005630.jpg

This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on October 29, 2021, to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio. The motion argues that Dr. Rocchio's opinions on "grooming" are subjective, not based on verifiable scientific methods, and therefore inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The defense claims her testimony is an attempt by the government to use a "blind" expert to improperly vouch for the accusers' truthfulness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005627.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 386) from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a Table of Authorities listing legal precedents, specifically focusing on case law regarding the admissibility of expert testimony (e.g., Daubert, Kumho Tire, Joiner). The document bears a Department of Justice footer (DOJ-OGR-00005627).

Legal filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search