Oxford University
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00035613.pdf
A letter dated July 30, 2019, from mathematician Jonathan Farley to Jeffrey Epstein, who was then incarcerated at MCC New York. Farley offers to publicly defend Epstein and generate positive media coverage ('show the world you are not a pariah') in exchange for a $5 million donation to Morgan State University or funding for a position at Oxford University. The letter references previous communications between the two in 2017, including a Skype call involving a student.
EFTA00034221.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a letter written to Jeffrey Epstein while he was incarcerated at MCC New York in July 2019. The sender, an academic claiming credentials from Oxford and Harvard, proposes a 'quid pro quo' arrangement: if Epstein donates $5 million to Morgan State University or funds the sender personally, the sender promises to publicly defend Epstein, generate positive media coverage, and help him avoid a conviction 'like Bill Cosby.' The sender leverages their academic standing and potential position at Oxford as a means to rehabilitate Epstein's public image.
DOJ-OGR-00018375.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Kate provides testimony about her first meeting with a person named Maxwell at Maxwell's townhouse, describing her feelings of finding a special and meaningful new friendship. Kate recounts sharing personal details with Maxwell, including her difficult home life with an unwell mother and her plans to study law at Oxford University, which Maxwell had also attended.
DOJ-OGR-00001586.jpg
This document is page 2 (labeled page 6 of 26 in the filing) of a legal defense filing arguing against the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship, long-term residency, and strong family ties to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. It also summarizes the government's position regarding her multiple citizenships and financial means, while refuting the claim that she was 'hiding' from law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00000962.jpg
This document is a page from a legal defense filing arguing against the pre-trial detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship since 1991 and strong family ties in the US to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. The defense disputes the government's claim that she was 'hiding,' asserting she was in regular contact with authorities through counsel since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00018378.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Kate. She testifies about a visit to Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse where she was introduced to Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell described Kate's talents and small physical size (95 lbs) to Epstein, then instructed Kate to squeeze Epstein's feet to demonstrate her strength.
DOJ-OGR-00002053.jpg
This is a character reference letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 28, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail request. The anonymous author, a family friend since age 15, describes the Maxwell family dynamic, characterizing Robert Maxwell as narcissistic and controlling while praising Ghislaine's work ethic, intelligence, and caring nature. The letter details the author's long-term relationships with various Maxwell siblings and the mother, Betty Maxwell, noting the author wrote a book for Betty prior to her death in 2013.
DOJ-OGR-00002042.jpg
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a 30-year friendship with Maxwell, noting her academic success at Oxford and honesty. The author details two specific trips to the US in February 2013 and December 2018 where they and their son stayed with Maxwell in New York and another redacted location, asserting they never witnessed inappropriate behavior.
DOJ-OGR-00002029.jpg
This document is a redacted character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The anonymous author outlines Maxwell's history, including her Oxford graduation, her move to New York in the early 1990s, and her philanthropic work with The Terramar Project and the UN. The letter strongly defends her character against media portrayals and asserts her innocence regarding the criminal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00019880.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal memorandum filed by the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her ties to the US, family support, and citizenship status to argue against flight risk. It counters the government's position that she was 'hiding' and argues that detention is not warranted.
DOJ-OGR-00010502.jpg
This document is page 2 of a character reference letter written by Ian Maxwell in support of his sister, Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 15, 2022. Ian describes Ghislaine as altruistic and highlights her education at Oxford and her entrepreneurial history in the UK and US. A significant portion of the letter focuses on her work founding the non-profit 'The TerraMar Project' (2012-2019) and its alignment with U.N. goals.
DOJ-OGR-00010497.jpg
This document is the first page of a character reference letter written by Isabel Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in support of her sister, Ghislaine Maxwell, prior to sentencing. Isabel highlights her own professional credentials, affirms her presence at the trial, and describes Ghislaine's upbringing, specifically noting the impact of their brother's death and the values instilled by their parents.
DOJ-OGR-00010495.jpg
This document is a character reference letter submitted to the court by Christine Malina Maxwell advocating for a lesser sentence for her sister, Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Ghislaine's work with The TerraMar Project, defends her character against media portrayals, and emphasizes her potential for future positive contributions to society.
DOJ-OGR-00010460.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, details the accomplishments and character of Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights her professional achievements, including becoming an EMT and pilot, and her philanthropic work, such as founding The TerraMar Project in 2012, which was later closed after Epstein's death. The document also references letters from family, including siblings Anne Halve and Philip Maxwell, and friends that aim to counter her negative public image.
DOJ-OGR-00010458.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details the biographical background of Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on her family's financial troubles in the 1970s and her father Robert Maxwell's controlling nature. It outlines her education at Marlborough College and Oxford, her early work history in Spain and France, and her relocation to New York in 1991 to launch 'The European' magazine shortly before her father's death.
DOJ-OGR-00011712.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript of the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that while four accusers will testify, the evidence will not support the charges, and she attempts to humanize Maxwell by highlighting her education and skills. The text also frames Jeffrey Epstein's image in the 1990s as a successful, charismatic philanthropist to explain Maxwell's association with him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016805.jpg
This document is a biographical list of participants in a gathering or initiative called 'The Deep Thinking Project.' It features high-profile academics, scientists, and authors associated with institutions such as MIT, Harvard, Oxford, and UC Berkeley. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to funding or connections involving Jeffrey Epstein's scientific patronage.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017560.jpg
This document is a page from a booklet (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017560) featuring biographical profiles of Charity Tillemann Dick and Geoffrey West. It details Charity's career as an opera singer and her medical history involving two lung transplants, alongside Geoffrey West's academic career as a theoretical physicist and leader at the Santa Fe Institute. The document appears to be an attendee bio page for a conference or high-profile gathering (possibly an Edge dinner or similar intellectual summit frequently attended by Epstein associates).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023439.jpg
This document appears to be a biographical sheet or marketing material produced for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 023439). It details the professional backgrounds of Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein, highlighting their academic roles and publications. It concludes with a description of Brockman, Inc., the literary agency founded by John Brockman, defining its focus on authors of 'the third culture.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023149.jpg
This document appears to be a proof page from a publication (likely by Oxford University Press, dated December 9, 2014) titled 'List of Abbreviations.' It lists various acronyms for international organizations, military forces, and political bodies primarily related to the Israel-Palestine conflict and the broader Middle East region. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023149', indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023147.jpg
This document is a biographical 'About the Editors' page from a book proof (dated Dec 9, 2014) published by Oxford University Press. It details the professional backgrounds of Nur Laiq and Fabrice Aidan. The document is relevant to Epstein investigations likely due to the connection with the International Peace Institute (IPI) and Terje Rød-Larsen (to whom Aidan was a special assistant); Rød-Larsen and the IPI have known financial and social ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015685.jpg
This document is a single page (Preface, page xi) from a book, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (015685). The text is a philosophical discussion by an engineer-author regarding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and free will, referencing works by Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett. The author argues against determinism and computational theories of mind, citing Andrew Wiles' 1996 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem as evidence of non-algorithmic human creativity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014961.jpg
This document is page 11 of 21 from a printout of the TED2017 conference program, dated April 20, 2017. It lists speaker bios for Lisa Genova, Robin Hanson, Anil Seth, Kristin Poinar, and Kate Marvel, detailing their academic affiliations (such as Oxford, George Mason, and NASA) and recent publications. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014961' stamp, indicating it is part of the evidence collected by the House Oversight Committee, likely illustrating the academic and scientific circles Jeffrey Epstein monitored or infiltrated.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015972.jpg
This document is page 282 from a book or scientific paper discussing the 'Penrose-Hameroff' theory of consciousness. It details the hypothesis by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff that consciousness arises from quantum computations within cellular microtubules, rather than just neuronal connections. The page bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015972', indicating it was part of a document production to the US House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or association with specific scientific research and figures like Hameroff.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015895.jpg
This document appears to be page 205 from a book titled 'Known Unknowns' or a similar academic text, stamped with a House Oversight footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015895). The text discusses mathematical inconsistency, the Peano axioms, and the implications of equating numbers (like 0 and 1) on logic systems. It introduces 'The Lucas Argument' regarding J.R. Lucas, Gödel's theorem, and Roger Penrose's later work arguing that the human mind functions outside formal rules, challenging Strong AI.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity