| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Xerox
|
Shareholder |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Shareholders Carl Icahn and Darwin Deason state Xerox should sell itself | Unknown | View |
A page from a philosophical essay or scientific paper (page 167) discussing evolutionary biology, the ethics of artificial intelligence (using the 'Trolley Problem'), and bioethics. The author argues that ethical 'red lines' shift over time, using the acceptance of IVF (Louise Brown) as an example, and speculates on the future of 'multiplex sentience' in animals and machines. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is evidence in a congressional investigation.
This page serves as a biographical introduction for psychologist Steven Pinker, likely preceding an essay written by him. It outlines his academic focus on naturalistic understanding and computational theory of mind, while summarizing his skepticism regarding catastrophic AI risk scenarios. The document is part of a House Oversight collection, indicated by the footer stamp.
A biographical excerpt describing the career of a scientist named George (likely George N. Krassner based on the book title 'Introduction to Space Communication'). The text details his rise to Chief Scientist at the Signal Corps in 1963, the rapid obsolescence of technology he faced while writing his book, and his later work at Simmonds Precision designing fuel gauging systems for the Apollo 17 command module. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
This document appears to be a section of a discussion paper or questionnaire, likely prepared for a scientific gathering or intellectual debate. It poses three specific questions (numbered 3, 4, and 5) regarding the origin of political institutions, the search for a Darwinian theory of human society, and the 'perverse incentives' within modern academia. The text critically analyzes the current state of social sciences and academic publishing, suggesting modern alternatives like Wikipedia or Reddit models for scientific validation.
This page appears to be a title page for 'Chapter 16: The Quest for Knowledge' from a larger work (likely a book or manuscript) included in an evidence file. It features an illustration of a sailing ship captioned 'Darwin’s Beagle' and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp at the bottom right.
This document discusses the historical roots of religious humanism in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, linking it to the rediscovery of Aristotle's texts. It then transitions to a specific theological debate regarding the concepts of love—specifically *agape*, *eros*, and *caritas*—highlighting the work of theologian Anders Nygren.
This document appears to be a page (Page 21) from a scientific paper or book regarding evolutionary biology and psychology, likely included as an exhibit in the House Oversight Committee's investigation (possibly related to Epstein's funding of scientific research). The text discusses the 'social brain hypothesis,' comparing the survival cooperation of Emperor penguins in the Antarctic to human social evolution, citing Darwin regarding altruism and group selection. It details the complexities of social living, including recognizing ingroup/outgroup members and navigating social hierarchies.
This document appears to be a page from a financial newsletter (likely Axios, based on the links) from approximately mid-March 2018, stamped as part of a House Oversight investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021102). It details upcoming public offerings, specifically the IPO of Deutsche Bank's asset management arm (DWS), as well as IPOs for blank check companies Opes Acquisition and Tiberius Acquisition. It also notes liquidity events involving shareholder activism by Carl Icahn and Darwin Deason regarding Xerox Corp.
This document appears to be page 167 of a scientific or philosophical book/essay included in a House Oversight investigation file. The text discusses evolutionary ethics, the intersection of religion and science, AI ethics (specifically the 'Trolley Problem' applied to machines), and bioethics regarding genetic engineering and animal intelligence. It references Richard Dawkins and uses the history of IVF (Louise Brown) to illustrate how ethical boundaries shift over time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity