Lindsey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
King
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00005581.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing arguing against the defense's interpretation of Brady material. The author contends that the cases cited by the defense (such as Kyles, Bowen, and Lindsey) concern the withholding of directly exculpatory evidence and do not support the defense's attempt to introduce irrelevant information to attack the general 'thoroughness' of the investigation. The document uses precedent from Watson v. Greene to argue that these cases offer no guidance on what evidence must be admitted at trial for cross-examination purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00005506.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the defense arguing against the government's pre-trial motion to ban challenges to the credibility of non-testifying witnesses. The defense contends the government's motion is vague, premature, and an attempt to circumvent procedural rules, as it asks the Court to rule on the admissibility of evidence before the context of a trial is established. The defense requests that the motion be denied or deferred until trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005498.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a defense argument for the admissibility of evidence concerning the history of investigations into Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends that explaining the timeline of the Florida and New York investigations, Epstein's 2019 indictment and death, and Maxwell's subsequent 2020 indictment is crucial for her defense and not confusing for a jury. The document refutes the government's concerns, arguing the narrative is straightforward and necessary to explain why Maxwell was not charged alongside Epstein initially.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity