| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Narrator
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Congressional hearing regarding impeachment/perjury | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Congressional hearing testimony during the Clinton Impeachment/Starr Investigation. | Washington D.C. (Congress) | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | Impeachment of Bill Clinton | Washington D.C. | View |
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) labeled with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017365. It details a contentious Congressional hearing during the Clinton impeachment era involving the Starr investigation, featuring a heated debate between Dershowitz, Leon Higginbotham, and Congressman Bob Barr regarding the concept of 'real America.' The text also includes a humorous interjection by Congressman Rogan regarding Harvard Law School.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal filing (page 277) submitted as evidence (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017364). It contains a first-person narrative by Alan Dershowitz recounting his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee during the Clinton impeachment hearings. The text features a transcript of a contentious exchange between Dershowitz, Chairman Henry Hyde, and Rep. John Conyers regarding perjury, partisanship, and the rule of law.
This document appears to be a page from a draft memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on context) stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. It details the author's legal advice to President Bill Clinton regarding the Paula Jones lawsuit, suggesting Clinton should have settled to avoid the deposition that led to his impeachment. The text also recounts the author's testimony before Congress, his conflict with Congressman Henry Hyde, and his arguments regarding the prevalence of perjury in the legal system.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity