Cain
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979-01-01 | Legal case | The case of United States v. Cain, 587 F.2d 678, was decided. | 5th Cir. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000316.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 9, 2019, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein does not prevent the United States from bringing federal criminal charges against him in other districts. It cites legal precedent and the U.S. Attorney's Manual to assert that the original agreement made by the USAO-SDFL was not binding on other jurisdictions like the Southern District of New York or the District of New Jersey. The document also addresses the rights of petitioners (victims) under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), stating they have not been denied the ability to confer with the government about potential charges against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015509.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 297) from an academic text or book titled 'Morality Games,' stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015509,' indicating it is part of an investigative evidence file. The text discusses psychological and philosophical concepts of altruism, the 'Envelope Game,' strategic vs. principled behavior, and Kantian ethics, utilizing examples ranging from religious figures to modern politicians like John Kerry. While it does not contain direct communications or flight logs, its inclusion in the Oversight files suggests it may have been part of the materials (likely scientific literature) exchanged within the Epstein network, known for its interest in evolutionary psychology and game theory.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity