Judge (implied)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jury
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury instruction | Instruction No. 42 was given to a jury, defining and comparing direct and circumstantial evidence. | Courthouse | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Jury instruction | A judge delivers a charge to the jury, outlining their duties and responsibilities for deliberati... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing of court transcript containing jury charge. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE regarding financial exhibits. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Judicial ruling | A judge overrules the defendant's objection and the Probation department's exclusion of two victi... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2018-08-09 | N/A | conference | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the definition of 'grooming' in abuse cases, with Dr. Rocchio clarifying that grooming is not a single specific behavior but a 'series and a pattern of behavior' used to deceive a child and build trust for abuse. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that individual behaviors within that pattern can appear benign or non-grooming in isolation.
DOJ-OGR-00008630.jpg
This document is page 92 of a court filing (Document 563) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The text contains standard jury instructions where the judge clarifies that their comments or questions should not be interpreted as an opinion on witness credibility or the evidence, emphasizing that the verdict is solely the jury's role.
DOJ-OGR-00008505.jpg
This document contains page 49 (marked as page 48 internally) of a court filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 17, 2021. It outlines jury instructions regarding the legal definition of conspiracy participation, clarifying that 'mere presence' or 'knowledge' is insufficient for conviction without intent and participation. It also notes that receiving a financial benefit is not required to prove conspiracy, though it can be a factor.
DOJ-OGR-00008666.jpg
This document is a page from court filings (specifically jury instructions or transcript) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The text outlines the legal standard for proving the objective of the conspiracy charged in Count Five, specifically regarding sex trafficking of minors. It instructs that if Maxwell agreed with another person to commit these acts beyond a reasonable doubt, the objective is proved.
Jury deliberation procedures
The judge provides instructions to the alternate jurors on their dismissal and to the deliberating jurors on the process, timing, and how to communicate with the court.
Request to break for the evening
The judge instructs the jury that they can communicate their wish to break for the evening by sending a note.
Instruction No. 2. Role of the jury.
The judge instructs the jury on their legal obligations, specifically that they must follow the law as given by the judge, act as the sole judges of the facts and witness credibility, and understand that statements by lawyers do not constitute evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity