Shankman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Florida Bar
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Court case Florida Bar v. Shankman (41 So. 3d 166, 172) cited for attorney's continuous hiring/fi... | Florida | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023169.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal report, specifically discussing Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4, which addresses conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, including dishonesty, fraud, and misrepresentation. It cites two Florida Bar cases, Frederick (2000) and Shankman (2010), to illustrate how these rules apply, particularly noting that an attorney's actions leading to delayed case resolution and increased client costs can violate FRPC 4-8.4(d). The document also references OPR's examination of FRPC 4-3.8 and the non-binding nature of American Bar Association (ABA) standards for prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00023291.tif
This document outlines sections of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC), specifically FRPC 4-4.1 regarding candor in dealing with others and FRPC 4-8.4 concerning conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. It details prohibitions against false statements, dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation by lawyers, and clarifies that conduct prejudicial to justice extends beyond judicial proceedings to the general practice of law, citing cases like Frederick and Shankman.
DOJ-OGR-00021455.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing, specifically an exhibit (SA-279) filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) and later in an appellate case (22-1426). The text outlines specific Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC), focusing on candor in dealing with others and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, likely used to argue that attorneys involved in the underlying case (potentially the Epstein plea deal) violated ethical standards regarding honesty and misrepresentation.
DOJ-OGR-00021331.jpg
This document appears to be page 131 of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed as an exhibit in court. It analyzes Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4 regarding attorney misconduct, specifically dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. A footnote clarifies that while OPR examined FRPC 4-3.8 and ABA standards, OPR does not consider ABA standards binding on Department of Justice prosecutors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity