New York University
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00032583.pdf
This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 3, 2019, summarizing various legal rulings, settlements, and news. It includes a job listing section at the end which features two positions at the law firm 'Epstein Drangel LLP,' which is likely the reason for the document's inclusion in this collection, though it appears unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein. The newsletter covers topics such as a Cravath/NYU ruling, an Ed Sheeran copyright trial, and various financial settlements.
DOJ-OGR-00010473.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing (Document 663, filed 06/15/22) titled "Professional Assessment of Impact of Conditions of Confinement." It details a report by Dr. Alexander Sasha Bardey, an independent forensic psychiatrist, who evaluated Ms. Maxwell from October 2020 to August 2021. The report concludes that Ms. Maxwell's ability to cope with legal proceedings and participate in her defense is being eroded due to her solitary confinement conditions, an observation corroborated by Ms. Saffian.
DOJ-OGR-00009457.jpg
This document is a professional biography and list of publications for Stephen Gillers, the Elihu Root Professor of Law at New York University, dated January 2012. It details his contact information, areas of teaching, prior courses taught, and a list of his major published books and anthologies, including information about his co-authors and publishers. The document appears to be part of a larger legal filing, as indicated by the case numbers in the header.
DOJ-OGR-00009447.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor and expert in legal ethics, filed on April 6, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gillers outlines his extensive qualifications and states that he has been asked by the court to provide an opinion on whether the attorneys for clients named Bruce and Richard fulfilled their ethical obligations regarding the potential failure to disclose a letter and an investigation concerning 'Juror No. 1' during March, May, and July of 2011.
DOJ-OGR-00025218.jpg
This document is page 1 of an interim Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Death report for Jeffrey Epstein, prepared by the Bureau of Prisons. It highlights significant limitations in the investigation, specifically noting that the FBI confiscated the original video of the incident and that formal interviews were not conducted to avoid interfering with DOJ investigations. The document provides background on Epstein's death at the MCC and a brief social history gathered from public sources due to the absence of a Pre-Sentence Report.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019163.jpg
TERSON ...heard those conversations, I when he was on the phone and like, I witnessed lots of things. I ally, you all [want to know]. like I w—I ...
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019092.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or narrative (likely by a comedian) included in House Oversight files. It details a comedy tour in the fall of 1981 and a performance at the Radical Humor Festival at NYU in spring 1982. The text focuses on the narrator's dark humor regarding rape, specifically referencing a 'detachable pussy' joke and a bit about the Mafia placing a contract on a rapist.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506.jpg
This page from a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506) details the political pressure exerted by the Chinese government on US university administrations regarding academic collaborations. It highlights how the CCP uses exchange programs as leverage, punishing universities like Emory, Maryland, and UCSD for hosting the Dalai Lama or discussing sensitive topics. The document notes a deterioration in academic freedom in China since 2013, citing specific policy shifts and the termination of numerous partnerships in 2018.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015702.jpg
This page appears to be an excerpt from a book or article regarding neuroscience, specifically discussing memory loss, visual agnosia, and 'blindsight.' It references pop culture (50 First Dates) and medical literature (Oliver Sacks). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015702' stamp, indicating it was part of a larger document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, though the content of this specific page is scientific/educational in nature rather than transactional.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015409.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or narrative essay (likely by Paul Krassner, based on the content) included in House Oversight files. It recounts a 1982 comedy performance at NYU, a discussion with comedian Robin Tyler about artificial insemination jokes, and references satirical headlines about 'The Rape Hall' and Quaaludes. The content seems tangential to financial or trafficking operations but may have been flagged for keywords like 'Rape' or 'Quaaludes'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025154.jpg
This document is page 8 of the 'Brockman, Inc. Frankfurt 2016 Hotlist,' a catalog of book proposals and author profiles likely prepared for the Frankfurt Book Fair. It features profiles for Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt regarding their work on 'The Coddling of the American Mind' (CAM) and campus free speech. It also includes a proposal for a book titled 'VIGILANCE' by cognitive scientist Hugo Mercier. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029841.jpg
An email dated June 14, 2011, from an assistant named Stephanie to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein), with Lesley Groff CC'd. The email lists various high-profile social events and fundraisers occurring in New York City that week, including parties involving Halle Berry, Zooey Deschanel, and Amy Poehler, sourced partly from Marshall Heyman at the WSJ. It also includes a formal calendar of business and networking events for that specific Tuesday.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016104.jpg
This document is a scanned page (labeled 414) from a book index, likely titled or related to 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It lists various scientific, mathematical, and historical terms and figures, including Roger Penrose, Shimon Pérez, and Oxford University. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016104', indicating it is part of a larger production of documents for a congressional oversight investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.jpg
This document is page 389 of a bibliography from a book, likely related to mathematics, logic, physics, music, or consciousness studies, given the titles listed (e.g., 'Gödel’s Theorem', 'Musicophilia', 'The Emperor’s New Mind'). It lists citations for works by prominent scientists and thinkers such as Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, Oliver Sacks, and Alan Turing. The page includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016444.jpg
This document appears to be a narrative summary or biographical excerpt from a House Oversight file (016444). It details the aggressive legal tactics used against a woman named Licata by Epstein's lawyers and provides a biographical overview of Epstein's rise from a teacher at the Dalton School to a financial advisor for Leslie Wexner. It lists his major assets, including the Manhattan mansion, Zorro Ranch, Little St. James, and various aircraft.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026352.jpg
This document is a list of detailed and probing questions, likely prepared for a deposition or interview with an individual implied to be Jeffrey Epstein. The questions, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026352', cover a vast range of his life, from his personal background and education to his high-profile meetings with political leaders, tech billionaires, and financiers. The inquiry touches on specific financial transactions, alleged advice given to powerful figures, and relationships with notable people from the 1970s through the early 2000s.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022453.jpg
This document is a page of testimonials for the publication 'Inference: International Review of Science', featuring positive feedback from academics William Kininmonth, Matthew Kleban, Lawrence Krauss, and Martin Krieger. The document's relevance to the Epstein case stems from the endorsement by Lawrence Krauss, a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, for a journal that was reportedly funded by Epstein. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022453' indicates this page was part of evidence submitted to a congressional committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity