Unidentified Author ('I')
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unidentified Recipient ('you')
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Joi
|
Observer |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A 'Forbidden Research conference' where a discussion group addressed whether 'democracy still wor... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The author visited the KZ Buchenwald concentration camp five times, which had a 'profound influen... | KZ Buchenwald | View |
| N/A | N/A | The author's research tour, which included a tour of Billionaire's Row and breakfast at the Top o... | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019691.jpg
This document is page 203 of a book (indicated by the header 'The Rise of the NSA'), likely produced during a House Oversight investigation given the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019691'. The text discusses the history of the NSA and CIA relations, the conflict between the NSA and hacktivists using Tor/encryption, and the expansion of NSA surveillance powers following the 9/11 attacks via the USA Patriot Act and Section 215. The footer indicates a print date of September 30, 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017227.jpg
This document appears to be a page (140) from a manuscript or book included in House Oversight records, dated April 2, 2012. The text is a polemic critique of Noam Chomsky for supporting Robert Faurisson, a Holocaust denier. It details historical analysis by scholar George Wellers regarding Dr. Kremer's testimony about Auschwitz gas chambers, arguing that Faurisson fraudulently omitted facts to support his denial, and criticizing Chomsky for legitimizing this work.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016826.jpg
This document appears to be a page (numbered 23) from an essay or book manuscript discussing the legacy of cyberneticist Norbert Wiener. The text explores Wiener's potential reactions to modern technologies like the Internet, deep learning, and renewable energy, while contrasting them with his historical fears of nuclear annihilation and authoritarianism. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or the Edge Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018201.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an article or opinion piece discussing the inefficacy of international sanctions. The author argues that sanctions often entrench dictators rather than removing them, citing historical examples in Iran, Cuba, Iraq, and Libya. The text specifically mentions Muammar Gaddafi's wealth allowing him to donate to the 'London School of' (presumably LSE), a detail often relevant in investigations regarding foreign funding of academic institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023573.jpg
This document appears to be a draft or transcript of a speech or article written by an unidentified individual (likely a Western expert or consultant) detailing their participation in China's Belt and Road forums between 2014 and 2016. The text contrasts China's embrace of globalization with US 'America First' protectionism and argues for the significance of infrastructure development. The document is stamped by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015457.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or article titled 'Alternative Facts' found within House Oversight discovery materials. The text is a highly critical political commentary contrasting the 2000 election of George Bush with the 2016 election of Donald Trump, focusing heavily on the electoral college and Hillary Clinton's involvement in both eras. The author, a former columnist for the New York Press, recounts sending a letter to Clinton regarding her unkept promise to abolish the electoral college.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013472.jpg
This document is a page from a legal affidavit responding to Jeffrey Epstein's allegations of improper discovery practices. The author justifies noticing Bill Clinton, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson for depositions by citing specific evidence: Clinton's extensive flight history and contact info found in Epstein's directory; Copperfield's frequent visits and an allegation of improper touching by a victim; and Richardson's presence at the New Mexico ranch and return of campaign donations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016047.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book or manuscript authored by an individual interested in high-level science, likely Jeffrey Epstein given the context of his scientific patronage. The text outlines a list of unsolved problems in Mathematics and Physics, referencing major awards like the Fields Medal and Nobel Prize. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016047', indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026401.jpg
This undated document is a personal letter or note from an unidentified author to a recipient (likely Jeffrey Epstein) discussing philosophical topics such as overpopulation, climate change, and fascism. The author, who identifies as East German, analyzes the recipient's 'political incorrectness' and recounts discussions from a 'Forbidden Research conference' about politics and diversity. A significant portion is dedicated to a critical analysis of the communication skills and methods of 'Joi' (likely Joi Ito), alleging he sanitizes topics and has others write his material.
Philosophical discussion on overpopulation, fascism, and ...
The author discusses controversial ideas like climate change as a solution to overpopulation and the nature of fascism, referencing literature and personal experiences. The author then analyzes the recipient's 'political incorrectness' and the communication strategies of a person named 'Joi', and recounts observations from a 'Forbidden Research conference'.
Philosophical discussion on overpopulation, fascism, and ...
The author discusses controversial ideas like climate change as a solution to overpopulation and the nature of fascism, referencing literature and personal experiences. The author then analyzes the recipient's 'political incorrectness' and the communication strategies of a person named 'Joi', and recounts observations from a 'Forbidden Research conference'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity