This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States, indicating that on January 15, 2025, Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, David Oscar Markus, served an Application for Extension of Time to File Certiorari Petition to the Solicitor General of the United States. The document provides contact information for Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel and the address of the Department of Justice.
This document is a confidential letter dated September 2, 2020, from the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the FBI. OPR informs the FBI that it has completed an investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR is providing the draft report to the FBI for a sensitivity review before releasing it to Congress and the public, noting that FBI personnel names will not appear in the final text.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from August 2020. It details the distribution of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. The Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their team are coordinating a review of this draft to identify any sensitive information that might impact ongoing investigations.
A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.
This is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States for case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. On May 9, 2025, Rina Danielson served a 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' upon the attorneys for both parties (David Oscar Markus and Solicitor General D. John Sauer) via mail. The document is stamped with DOJ bates number DOJ-OGR-00000215.
Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley write to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip requesting a review of federal involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case, which they characterize as a 'quintessentially state matter.' They criticize a previous 'limited' review conducted by CEOS at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, alleging it ignored professional misconduct by federal prosecutors and failed to assess the Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
This document is a page from an address book (page 86) containing contact information for several individuals, with a significant focus on Les Wexner. It details Wexner's various properties (Aspen, London, New Albany, Tallassee Plantation), his flight department, and his company 'The Limited Inc.', listing numerous staff members, vehicles (including multiple Mercedes, Jeeps, and Range Rovers), and phone numbers. Other notable entries include fashion designer Vera Wang, Cristalle Wasche, Alexia Wallaert, and a contact entry for the White House.
A letter from Kenneth Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to John Roth (DOJ) dated June 19, 2008, arguing that federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. Starr outlines four supplemental submissions being sent to the DOJ, which include allegations of misconduct during the federal investigation, a rebuttal to claims by the Miami USAO, and a letter from a former CEOS attorney. The document indicates an aggressive legal defense strategy aimed at preventing federal charges.
This document is a post-election analysis from Washington Council Ernst & Young dated November 9, 2016. It details Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the Republicans retaining control of Congress, and outlines potential policy agendas and political challenges, such as filling the Supreme Court vacancy. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity