Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ronald Weich

Person
Mentions
7
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
3
Also known as:
Ronald Weich (Assistant Att'y Gen.)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jon Kyl
Correspondence
7
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2011-11-03 N/A Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich sent a letter to Senator Kyl. Washington D.C. View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017628.jpg

This document contains page 25 of a legal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. It analyzes the Department of Justice's policies regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA), specifically debating when victim rights attach (pre-charging vs. post-charging). It cites correspondence between Senator Kyl and the DOJ (Ronald Weich) and references FBI statistics from Fiscal Year 2011 regarding victim services.

Legal journal article / house oversight exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017620.jpg

This document is a page from a legal journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the OLC ignored Senator Kyl's intent that victim rights apply before charges are filed. The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' as a notable example where the OLC's interpretation allowed a non-prosecution agreement to nullify victims' rights to be heard.

Legal journal article / brief exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014062.jpg

This document page, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp, is an excerpt from a legal analysis (likely a law review article) criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the OLC incorrectly concluded that victims' rights do not apply before an indictment is filed, contradicting the legislative intent of Senator Jon Kyl, a primary sponsor of the Act. The text highlights that even the OLC acknowledged their interpretation might contradict 'good practice' regarding pre-charging plea discussions, a critical legal issue relevant to the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement controversy.

Law review article / legal analysis (house oversight committee production)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
0
Total
4

Response regarding CVRA/VRRA

From: Ronald Weich
To: Senator Kyl/Congress

Noted OLC opinion that CVRA did not extend rights before formal charges, but AG guidelines go further.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Response regarding CVRA interpretation

From: Ronald Weich
To: Jon Kyl

A belated response that did not address Kyl's concern about his remarks being quoted out of context.

Letter
2011-11-03
Communication Source

Response regarding CVRA interpretation

From: Ronald Weich
To: Jon Kyl

A belated response that did not address Kyl's concern about his remarks being quoted out of context.

Letter
2011-11-03
Communication Source

Response to Kyl's letter

From: Ronald Weich
To: Jon Kyl

Described as a 'belated response' that did not address Kyl's concern about his remarks being quoted out of context.

Letter
2011-11-03
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search