Imran H. Ansari
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Filing of Reply Letter by Alan Dershowitz's counsel. | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-12-05 | N/A | Filing of the letter requesting pre-motion conference. | New York, NY | View |
018.pdf
A letter from attorney Imran H. Ansari, representing non-party Alan Dershowitz, to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests that the Court order the plaintiff to file an amended complaint removing specific allegations regarding Dershowitz (paragraph 39) that the Court had previously ordered stricken as 'redundant, immaterial, impertinent, and/or scandalous' on December 23, 2019.
011.pdf
This document is a legal reply letter dated December 16, 2019, from attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Dershowitz seeks to intervene in the civil case *Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein* to strike specific allegations in the complaint he deems scandalous and irrelevant, and to request sanctions against Farmer and her legal team (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP). The letter argues that the allegations against Dershowitz have no bearing on Farmer's claims of battery and emotional distress against the Epstein Estate and are part of a 'campaign of personal animus'.
009.pdf
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
EFTA00014595.pdf
A 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, regarding the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (20-2413). The document confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Hearing Date Acknowledgment' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on October 9, 2020, and lists the attorneys served electronically with the notice.
DOJ-OGR-00020596.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 28, 2022, from an appellate counsel at the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, P.C. to the Clerk of Court. The lawyer, newly assigned to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, requests an extension to file the Appellant's Brief, moving the deadline from October 14, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The justification for the request includes the voluminous nature of the case record (over 3,800 pages of transcripts and 738 docket entries) and the fact that the lawyer has been unable to meet with Maxwell following her recent transfer to a prison in Tallahassee, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00010658.jpg
This is a letter dated June 16, 2022, from Alan Dershowitz's attorneys to the U.S. prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The attorneys inform the prosecution about a recent, confidential deposition of Virginia Giuffre from her civil lawsuit against Dershowitz, arguing it contains information critical to her credibility. They urge the prosecutors to obtain and review this deposition transcript before allowing Giuffre to provide a victim impact statement at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity