Trove
Sign In Sign Up

expert witnesses

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
3
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person attorneys
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding A civil litigation in which Maxwell produced documents that were shared with various parties unde... N/A View
N/A Trial The legal proceeding for which the juror is being considered. Courtroom View
N/A Trial The legal proceeding for which the juror is being selected. The juror is instructed not to discus... courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00009076.jpg

This document is page 9 of a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no feelings or opinions about evidence from law enforcement searches or the use of expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms their willingness and ability to follow the court's instruction to avoid all media and any discussion of the case outside the courtroom until their jury service is complete.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009767.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror 50 in case 2:20-cr-00030-ABN, filed on March 24, 2022. The juror indicates they have no feelings or opinions about law enforcement searches or expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms they have no reservations about their ability to follow strict instructions to avoid all media and not discuss the case outside the courtroom.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005287.jpg

This document is page 11 of 40 from a jury questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page contains questions 15, 16, and 17 (renumbered from 14, 15, and 16) asking prospective jurors about their biases regarding law enforcement searches/evidence, their experience with expert witnesses, and their ability to adhere to strict media blackout instructions during the trial. The document includes handwritten edits renumbering the questions.

Court filing - jury questionnaire (page 11 of 40)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search