| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Al Rajhi Bank
|
Senior officer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Suleiman al Rajhi
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Abdullah al Rajhi
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
This document contains the footnotes (citations 75-96) from a 2012 legal document titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It references evidentiary exhibits, FBI reports, and Treasury Department documents concerning the financing of terrorism, specifically alleging that senior officers of al Rajhi Bank knowingly sponsored al Qaeda. The document mentions the 'Golden Chain' donor list and cites the 9/11 Commission Monograph on Terrorist Financing multiple times.
This document appears to be a page (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023412) from a Westlaw printout of the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It contains footnotes 52 through 74, which cite various intelligence reports (CIA, UN, Interpol) and testimonies (Richard Clarke, Lee Wolosky) regarding Al Qaida, Usama Bin Laden, and terrorist financing. Footnote 70 specifically identifies officials of the Al Rajhi Bank as the 'Al Rajhi Defendants'. While the document is part of a House Oversight collection, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).
This document is a Westlaw printout (dated 2019) bearing a House Oversight Committee bates stamp. It details legal proceedings regarding the 'Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation, specifically summarizing Judge Daniels' 2010 dismissals of numerous defendants (including members of the Bin Laden family, Saudi banks, and other individuals) for lack of personal jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The text focuses on the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act and the requirement to prove specific intent to support the 9/11 attacks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity