victims' counsel

Person

Mentions

4

Relationships

2

Events

6

Documents

2

Also known as:

Victims' Counsel (Edwards/Cassell)

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

2 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person defendant	Legal representative	5	1	View
person victims	Legal representative	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2025-08-05	N/A	Litigation of Doe v. United States, 08-80736	S.D. Fla.	View
2019-10-15	N/A	Meeting between representatives from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New ...	Florida	View
2008-12-29	N/A	Email correspondence regarding GPS exclusionary zones	Email	View
2008-07-11	N/A	Court hearing on victims' emergency motion.	U.S. District Court, Southe...	View
2008-07-11	N/A	Court hearing where the existence of the secret NPA was revealed.	US District Court, Southern...	View
0025-08-05	N/A	Filing of Document 73 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB	Court	View

DOJ-OGR-00008375.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 545) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 15, 2021. The text argues against a motion by the defendant to compel victims' attorneys to testify, citing Federal Rules of Evidence 402 and 403 and the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege. The argument emphasizes that forcing counsel to testify against their clients, particularly victims of sexual abuse, is legally disfavored and damaging to the attorney-client relationship.

Legal filing / court memorandum (page 2 of 9)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000773.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing in the case regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490), dated August 5, 2025. It argues for strict adherence to grand jury secrecy rules (Rule 6(e)) to protect the privacy of victims, many of whom were minors at the time of abuse. The filing outlines specific requested relief, including requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, conducting judicial in camera reviews of materials, and allowing victims' counsel to review proposed redactions prior to any public release to prevent re-identification.

Legal filing / court motion (page 3)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

0

As Recipient

4

Total

4

Unsealing or public release of grand jury materials

From: Government officials

To: victims' counsel

Request for the Government to confer with victims' counsel and provide reasonable notice before rulings on unsealing materials.

Conferral

N/A

Communication Source

Sentencing and Right to be Heard

From: the government

To: victims' counsel

Notification regarding sentencing and rights for six impacted individuals.

Notification

2022-07-22

Communication Source

Objection to joinder

From: the government

To: victims' counsel

Government objected to adding new petitioners without stating a reason.

Objection

2014-12-23

Communication Source

Response to stipulation request

From: the government

To: victims' counsel

Government stated it was seeking more time to provide a position.

Email

2014-12-10

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity