United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00028713.pdf
This document is an internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated May 25, 2021. It circulates a draft legal opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail application/motion for release in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. The sender requests edits from the team before a deadline on the following Thursday.
DOJ-OGR-00022066.jpg
This document is page 'iii' of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 24, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (which corresponds to USA v. Parnas et al., though released in a DOJ OGR batch). It lists numerous legal precedents (case law citations) primarily from the Second Circuit and Southern District of New York, referencing cases such as U.S. v. Coppa, U.S. v. Ghailani, and others used to support legal arguments in the main brief.
DOJ-OGR-00021658.jpg
This document is page 11 of 93 from a legal filing (Case 22-1426), dated June 29, 2023. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main brief, including 'United States v. Salameh', 'United States v. Teman', and 'United States v. Vickers'. The footer indicates it is a Department of Justice document (DOJ-OGR-00021658).
DOJ-OGR-00009156.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal filing (Doc 615) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that the Court should have further probed 'Juror 50' regarding his ability to set aside past traumatic experiences and fairly evaluate the testimony of defense expert Dr. Loftus. The filing cites voir dire transcripts from November 16, 2021, where Juror 50 affirmed his ability to be impartial, and references case law (*United States v. Pirk*, *United States v. Barnes*) regarding the limited purpose of voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00008982.jpg
This document is page 3 of 13 from a legal filing (Document 609) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law). The cases cited largely pertain to press access, public trials, and the sealing of judicial documents (e.g., Associated Press, Press-Enterprise Co.), suggesting the filing relates to transparency issues or the unsealing of evidence in the Maxwell trial.
DOJ-OGR-00003058.jpg
This document is page 97 (filed page 124) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains legal arguments regarding the Fifth Amendment, citing case law to establish that the government is not required to inform a witness of the nature of an investigation or their status within it to avoid self-incrimination. The text also introduces the 'Act of Production Privilege' as a subset of Fifth Amendment rights.
DOJ-OGR-00002953.jpg
This document is page 19 of 239 from Document 204 filed on April 16, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is a Table of Authorities page (numbered xviii) listing legal precedents cited in the filing, specifically cases beginning with 'United States v.' followed by names starting with M through N. It contains standard legal citations and page references for the brief.
DOJ-OGR-00002947.jpg
This document is page 13 (pagination xii) of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing previous legal cases (legal precedents) cited elsewhere in the full brief, predominantly from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026593.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (numbered 7 through 23) from a larger legal memorandum or tax opinion included in the House Oversight Committee's release. It contains technical legal citations regarding U.S. tax code, specifically concerning the classification of business entities, trusts, 'Kintner Regulations,' QSub elections (Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiaries), and insurance companies. The latest date cited in the text is 1999, suggesting the document was created in or after that year.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity