Potter Stewart
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00022059.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 7, 2020, sent by the U.S. DOJ Attaché in London to the SDNY team, confirming that a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request regarding Prince Andrew ('Material Witness PA') was officially delivered to the UK Central Authority. The email details the logistical challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, notes that the prosecution had unsuccessfully sought a voluntary interview for months, and outlines the UK legal process, including potential assignment to the London Metropolitan Police and the possibility of a 'Judicial Review' if the witness resists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016972.jpg
This document discusses the intersection of emerging artificial intelligence technologies and established human rights frameworks. It explores the ethical challenges of integrating non-human intelligences into society, referencing historical declarations of rights and debating whether machines can or should replace humans in roles requiring dignity and care. The text also touches on the necessity of making ethical decision-making explicit and algorithmic in the age of autonomous systems.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017216.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or essay written by Alan Dershowitz (identified via references to his books 'Finding Jefferson' and 'Shouting Fire'). The text discusses the author's stance on free speech, arguing for precise 'speech codes' on university campuses to prevent arbitrary censorship while acknowledging that extreme forms of speech (like racial slurs used by professors) are inevitably censored. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017209.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on the legal representation described) recounting the 1971 Pentagon Papers case. It details the author's role representing Senator Mike Gravel and Beacon Press, and highlights a specific Supreme Court oral argument exchange between Justice Potter Stewart and Alexander Bickel regarding the balance between the First Amendment and national security. The document is stamped with a House Oversight file number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016389.jpg
This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.
Hypothetical Scenario
Debate regarding the death of soldiers vs. First Amendment rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity