NIH
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00020655.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 16 to April 19, 2021. It details various motions to dismiss and suppress evidence filed by Maxwell's defense team, orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting an arraignment date for April 23, 2021, and procedural orders regarding the severance of perjury counts and the handling of redacted documents. The document highlights the legal maneuvering regarding the S2 Superseding Indictment and disputes over evidence obtained via subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg
This document is a court docket page (Page 31 of 92) listing entries from April 16 to April 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several filings by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) including motions to dismiss counts of the superseding indictment and suppress evidence. Key orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan schedule an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment for April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, sever perjury counts for a separate trial, and request government intent regarding the use of disputed subpoenaed documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020494.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet page covering July 6-7, 2020, detailing the scheduling of Ghislaine Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders setting a remote video hearing for July 14, 2020, establishing strict protocols for public access at the Moynihan Courthouse and outlining requirements for the defendant's waiver of physical presence. The document also logs correspondence from both defense counsel Mark Cohen and prosecutor Alex Rossmiller regarding the scheduling logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017075.jpg
This document is a page from the attendee list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile participants including Bill and Melinda Gates, Timothy Geithner (then US Treasury Secretary), and Thomas Friedman (NYT), categorized by name, title, organization, and country. The document bears the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017075', indicating it was part of a US House Oversight Committee document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017001.jpg
This document is page 6 of a scientific paper titled 'Culturomics' published in Sciencexpress on December 16, 2010, bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017001. It contains a bibliography and an acknowledgments section detailing funding sources for the research, specifically noting the 'Program for Evolutionary Dynamics' at Harvard, which was historically funded by Jeffrey Epstein (though Epstein is not explicitly named on this page). The document also acknowledges support from Google, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the NIH, and the Templeton Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017533.jpg
This document contains biographical profiles for two individuals: Adam Bly and Dr. Scott Bolton. Adam Bly is the founder of Seed magazine and a Young Global Leader associated with the World Economic Forum. Dr. Scott Bolton is a Director at the Southwest Research Institute and a Principal Investigator for NASA's Juno project. The document appears to be a briefing paper or backgrounder, marked with a House Oversight Committee file number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027242.jpg
This document is an electronic message log from April 20, 2017, marked with a House Oversight footer. It captures a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The discussion involves scheduling for May 4th or 5th and the sharing of scientific news articles, specifically regarding contenders for the NIH chief position (mentioning 'Neal' and 'Geoff Ling') and a Washington Post article about naked mole rats.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027239.jpg
This document is a digital message log from April 20, 2017, detailing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss an unidentified male subject associated with NIH and Johns Hopkins who is 'looking for his next gig.' Epstein asks to Skype the individual, but the redacted sender suggests an in-person meeting in NYC, describing the subject as 'a character.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015673.jpg
This document appears to be page 2 of a CV for a high-level medical administrator or executive (likely associated with Mount Sinai). It details their work as a Global Health Project Leader (2002-2015), Director of Strategic Initiatives (2001-2002), and Assistant Dean (1998-2001). Key activities include coordinating Haiti earthquake relief with the Clinton Foundation and Partners in Health, negotiating the use of a Honeywell corporate jet, and managing significant medical missions in Liberia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013543.jpg
This document appears to be page 43 of a memoir or manuscript written by an academic scientist (likely an associate of Epstein, given the House Oversight stamp). The text details the narrator's obsessive running habits across various global locations (NYC, Munich, Israel, etc.) and links this physical exertion to spiritual experiences and 'God.' The narrator also discusses professional frustrations, specifically a conflict with a Dean over research space and a rejected NIH grant proposal, which the narrator plans to resubmit for double the funding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029931.jpg
This document is a scanned page from the December 12, 2011 issue of The New Yorker (page 36), bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp. It contains a profile of Harvard Medical School professor Ted Kaptchuk, detailing his unconventional background, his NIH-funded research into the placebo effect, and the author's own experience with medical reassurance acting as a placebo. While the document is part of a House Oversight production (possibly related to investigations into scientific funding or associations), the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029928.jpg
This document appears to be a scanned page from a magazine article (likely The New Yorker) discussing the science of the placebo effect, featuring researchers Ted Kaptchuk and Wayne Jonas. It details historical studies on morphine, Valium, and IBS, discussing the distinction between disease and illness. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029928' stamp, suggesting it was gathered as evidence in a Congressional investigation, though the text itself contains no direct reference to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or financial crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029922.jpg
This document is a policy backgrounder or biography for U.S. Representative Diana DeGette, detailing her legislative achievements as of roughly mid-2010. It highlights her leadership in the 111th Congress regarding health care reform (ACA and SCHIP), her role as the 'chief architect' of stem cell research legislation, and her position as co-chair of the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus protecting reproductive rights. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029512.jpg
The narrator recounts their immigration from India to the United States to pursue a medical career, detailing their residency in New Jersey and Boston. They describe entering the field of neuroendocrinology, training under Seymour Reichlin at Tufts, and meeting Candace Pert, who introduced them to the concept of "molecules of emotion."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029430.jpg
This document contains the conclusion of a memo from MIT administrators Martin A. Schmidt and Maria T. Zuber regarding proposed federal cuts to indirect cost recovery for research grants. They warn that a cap on these costs would severely impact MIT's ability to maintain research infrastructure, potentially leading to layoffs, salary freezes, or facility deterioration. The document specifically references a proposed 22% cut to the NIH budget (likely circa 2017) and is part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee investigation (likely regarding MIT's financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not named on this specific page).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016391.jpg
The text explores the philosophical and ethical boundaries between humans and machines, questioning the definitions of consciousness and free will in the context of robot rights. It also critiques arbitrary "red lines" in genetic engineering, arguing that distinctions in bioethics are often inconsistent and that technologies like germline manipulation offer practical benefits that outweigh traditional prohibitions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity