| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Amorgianos v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 7 of document 397 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for admitting expert testimony under the 'Daubert' framework, citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and numerous precedent cases. The text explains that a court must first assess an expert's qualifications and then determine if their testimony is both relevant and reliable, detailing several criteria for establishing reliability.
This page from a legal filing discusses the standards for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. It cites several key legal precedents, including Daubert and Kumho Tire, to outline the court's responsibility to ensure an expert's opinion is reliable and based on sound methodology. The document also specifies that even if testimony meets these standards, it can be excluded under other rules, such as Rule 704, which prohibits experts in criminal cases from opining on a defendant's mental state.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity