Henry
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00037104.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated October 19, 2023, from a coalition of 17 State Attorneys General (led by New Mexico AG Raúl Torrez) to Judge Jed S. Rakoff regarding the case Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The Attorneys General object to Section 1.25 of the proposed settlement, which attempts to release 'sovereign or government' claims. They argue this language improperly interferes with their authority to bring parens patriae actions under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) on behalf of trafficking victims, contrasting this with the Deutsche Bank settlement which did not contain such a release.
EFTA00021202.pdf
This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.
DOJ-OGR-00003139.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing by the prosecution (the "Government") arguing against the defendant's request for a "bill of particulars." The Government contends that the existing 18-page Indictment provides sufficient detail about the charges, which involve conspiracies with Jeffrey Epstein to traffic minors between 1994-1997 and a subsequent cover-up during a 2016 deposition. Citing legal precedents, the prosecution argues that providing more detail would unfairly restrict its case and could allow the defendant to tailor her testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00003138.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated April 16, 2021, arguing against the misuse of a 'bill of particulars'. It cites numerous court cases to establish the legal precedent that a bill of particulars is not a tool for the defense to compel the Government to disclose its evidence, witnesses, or trial strategy. The document asserts that such a bill is only warranted when an indictment is so vague that it prevents the defendant from preparing a defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027378.jpg
This document is a log of electronic messages from August 1, 2018, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on China's geopolitical strategy, specifically the concept of 'weaponizing' their consumer base, digitizing consumer behavior (likely referring to social credit systems), and the ability of the Chinese state to instantly stop the sale of Western products like Microsoft, contrasting this power with US political influence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity