| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Podesta Group
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Podesta Group
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Podesta Group
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report (likely Republican-authored) criticizing the origins of the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation. It argues that the investigation into the Trump campaign was based on flimsy evidence, specifically attacking the credibility of the George Papadopoulos entrapment theory and the Steele Dossier, while contrasting this with alleged financial ties between the Clintons and Russian interests. The text details specific dates in August 2016 regarding letters sent to FBI Director Comey by Democrats pushing the collusion narrative.
This document, originating from House Oversight records, argues that the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated and lacked evidence of collusion at its inception. It contrasts the handling of the Trump investigation with the Clinton email investigation and highlights financial ties between the Clinton sphere (Foundation, Podesta Group) and Russian entities. It references a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years to support the argument that the investigation violated standard protocol.
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, argues against the legitimacy of the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign. It contends that the investigation violated Justice Department norms regarding election-year impartiality and asserts there was no evidence of collusion when the probe began. The text contrasts the scrutiny of the Trump campaign with the activities of the Clinton campaign (funding the Steele dossier) and the Podesta Group's ties to Russian entities.
This document, a page from a House Oversight report, argues that the 'Crossfire' investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia was politically motivated and lacked sufficient evidence. It contrasts this with the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server and alleges that the Clinton campaign and associated entities, such as The Podesta Group and the Clinton Foundation, had their own financial ties to Russian-linked interests. Contrary to the user's prompt, the document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, a page from a House Oversight report, argues that the 'Crossfire' investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was a politically motivated counterintelligence probe lacking discernible evidence at its launch. It contrasts this with actions by the Clinton campaign and associated groups, such as funding the Steele Dossier and lobbying for Kremlin-tied entities, suggesting a double standard in how Russian connections were treated. The author posits that the case against Trump campaign associate George Papadopoulos was a form of entrapment and that no real evidence of collusion has emerged.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity