David F. Levi
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ed Carnes
|
Professional correspondence |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Hon. Susan C. Bucklew
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00004698.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by A. Marie Villafaña, an Assistant United States Attorney, filed on July 9, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Villafaña outlines her professional background, including her 1993 graduation from Berkeley Law, her bar admissions in Florida, California, and Minnesota, and her past work as a judicial clerk. The declaration establishes her credentials and her employment as an AUSA during the events relevant to the case involving petitioner Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017745.jpg
This document is page 31 of a legal text (likely a law review article from 2005 BYU Law Review) discussing amendments to Federal Rule 32(c)(1)(B) regarding presentence investigation reports and restitution for victims. It analyzes the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) and the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), arguing that courts should receive restitution information even when restitution is discretionary ('permits') rather than just mandatory ('requires'). The document bears the name 'David Schoen' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney) at the bottom and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017710.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights (CVRA). It details changes to Rules 1, 5, 12.1, 12.3, and 17 proposed by the Advisory Committee in 2007, specifically focusing on victim representation, protection during detention hearings, and subpoena notifications. The document bears the name of David Schoen, Epstein's attorney, and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of legal materials submitted to Congress regarding the handling of the Epstein case and victims' rights statutes.
Rules of Practice and Procedure
Cited in footnotes as 'Bucklew Memo'.
Proposed expansion of Rule 32
Noting that proposed expansion of Rule 32 should be withdrawn if the CVRA was passed.
Proposed expansion of Rule 32
Noting that proposed expansion of Rule 32 should be withdrawn if the CVRA was passed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity