| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Elisa New
|
Employment |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor program founder |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
IBM
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wang Jianlin
|
Donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor beneficiary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cristina Pato
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elisa New
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Verse Video Education
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
EZRA VOGEL
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence Summers
|
Academic contributor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin A. Nowak
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin A. Nowak
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Peter Galison
|
Employment |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-07-28 | N/A | News report on Foundation and MIT Media Lab restoring Rothko murals | New York | View |
| 2003-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University | Harvard University | View |
| 1944-01-01 | N/A | IBM supplied the first Harvard architecture computer to Harvard University. | Harvard University | View |
This document is a fragment of an email correspondence from Elisa New, a professor at Harvard University, discussing a project pitch that involves high-profile figures such as President Clinton, journalists, and senators. She mentions seeking a 'release' and asks the recipient about her chances of obtaining it. The email concludes with a confidentiality footer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and lists the contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document appears to be a page from an email chain containing repeated confidentiality disclaimers and a signature block. The signature belongs to Elisa New, a professor at Harvard University. The disclaimers identify the communication as the property of 'JEE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and direct error notifications to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document is stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029249.
This document is a fragment of an email chain featuring the signature block of Harvard Professor Elisa New and a confidentiality disclaimer belonging to 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The text provides New's academic address in Cambridge, MA, and directs anyone receiving the email in error to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number.
This document is a partial email from Harvard Professor Elisa New to Jeffrey Epstein. New expresses gratitude for a financial gift from Epstein that legitimized her humanities project at Harvard, secured studio space, and paid staff salaries. She also mentions professional interactions with the Templeton Foundation, Success Academy, and Joe Biden, who agreed to discuss a poem with her.
This document is a progress report and fundraising update sent to Jeffrey Epstein regarding the 'Poetry in America' project at Harvard. The sender details partnerships with organizations like Greenwich Country Day School and HarvardX, and sets a fundraising goal of $2.5 million for the upcoming year. The letter explicitly thanks Epstein for his support and advice regarding the Templeton Foundation, and highlights a transformative financial gift from Leon Black that legitimized the project within Harvard's administration.
This document is page 25 of a Standard & Poor's economic research report dated August 5, 2014, titled 'How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth.' The content consists of endnotes (citations 43-61) referencing various economic studies, reports from the IMF, CBO, and academic papers regarding inequality, minimum wage, and economic recovery. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025787' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a list of participants and their biographies for 'The Deep Thinking Project.' It appears to be an attachment or briefing document from the House Oversight Committee investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016222). The list includes prominent academics, scientists, and authors from institutions such as MIT, Harvard, Oxford, and UC Berkeley.
This document is page 410 from a book index, stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016100', indicating it is part of an evidence collection by the House Oversight Committee (likely related to investigations involving Epstein/Maxwell and their connections to academia/science). The index lists various scientific, philosophical, and cultural terms and figures, including 'Bill Gates', 'Stephen Hawking', 'Harvard University', and 'Google'. The running header is 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'.
This document is a page from a bibliography or reference section of a larger work, stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016080', indicating it is evidence in a congressional investigation. It lists academic publications related to artificial intelligence, mathematics, and logic, including works by Alan Turing, Ray Kurzweil, and Roger Penrose. Notably, it cites 'Computation' by Marvin Minsky, a scientist with known ties to Jeffrey Epstein, linking the document to the broader investigation into Epstein's scientific connections.
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript, likely a deposition involving House Oversight. A witness is questioned about their knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with academics in Florida and New York, and specifically whether they knew Epstein had an office at Harvard (which the witness denies). The page concludes with an attorney, Mr. Scarola, interrupting to note that the session must end at 4:30 PM per a prior agreement.
This document appears to be a profile or news article detailing the career of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, specifically focusing on his conflict with State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein investigation. It highlights Reiter's letter urging Krischer to recuse himself, his subsequent referral of the Epstein case to the FBI, and provides biographical details of his career, including high-profile investigations involving the Kennedy family. The text establishes Reiter's reputation for professionalism and integrity among his peers.
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
This document appears to be a news article or column critiquing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case (circa 2006). It contrasts the overwhelming evidence collected by police—including phone messages, school transcripts, and witness testimony—against the prosecutors' reluctance to charge Epstein due to perceived victim credibility issues. The text highlights a controversial quote from a State Attorney spokesman admitting that wealth can indeed buy a different standard of justice.
This newspaper clipping details the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on civil lawsuits filed by two 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs. It highlights a family conflict where the mother of the first Jane Doe is trying to halt the lawsuit filed by the father, citing the daughter's estrangement from him. The article also mentions Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew), the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz involving Myspace evidence, and attorney Herman's press conference at the bridge used to transport recruited girls.
This document appears to be page 108 of an academic book or paper included in a House Oversight Committee file dump (Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021354). The text discusses theological history, specifically focusing on Jonathan Edwards, anthropomorphism in religion, and the conflict between science and religion. It includes a list of references citing various academic works published between 1874 and 2008. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
This document is page 39 of a larger file labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021285', containing a list of academic endnotes (numbered 14-29). The citations reference works in sociobiology, evolutionary psychology, theology, and philosophy, including prominent authors such as E.O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, John Cacioppo, Thomas Aquinas, Aristotle, and Kant. While no direct narrative text links to Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page, the content reflects the high-level academic and scientific interests often associated with Epstein's funding activities (particularly evolutionary biology).
This document appears to be a page from a 2018 news article (likely the Miami Herald) included in a House Oversight Committee file. It details the legal maneuvering by Epstein's high-profile legal team to avoid prison time for him and highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Detective Joseph Recarey to investigate Epstein despite the risks to their careers. The text describes the influx of underage girls to Epstein's Palm Beach compound and the wealthy environment of the island.
This document is a page from an essay titled 'Algorists Dream of Objectivity' by Harvard science historian Peter Galison. The text discusses the history of algorithms and contrasts 'clinical' (subjective) judgment with 'algorithmic' (objective) prediction, citing a study by psychologists Grove and Meehl that argues algorithmic prediction is generally superior. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to the Edge Foundation or scientific networks associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a professional profile of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter, detailing his career history, character, and involvement in high-profile investigations, including the deaths of David Kennedy and the case against William Kennedy Smith. It notes that following Jeffrey Epstein's indictment, Reiter referred the case to the FBI. A confidentiality notice at the end indicates the document is the property of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a single page of testimonials for the journal 'Inference: International Review of Science'. It features positive feedback from five distinguished academics, including a Nobel laureate, who praise the journal's quality, professionalism, and content. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022450', is part of a larger set of records related to a congressional investigation, and the journal 'Inference' has been widely reported to have been funded by Jeffrey Epstein.
This document outlines recommendations for the U.S. Congress regarding its approach to China. It advocates for promoting transparency through congressional oversight, integrity by distinguishing real threats like espionage from manageable issues like Confucius Institutes, and reciprocity by carefully considering the broader bilateral relationship and potential consequences before taking action. The page concludes with a detailed list of sources cited in the section.
This document is a list of participants in a foreign policy working group, detailing their names and professional affiliations. The discussions for the group's report took place at the Hoover Institution, Sunnylands, and George Washington University. Despite being labeled as 'Epstein-related', this specific document contains no discernible information, names, or events connected to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This article from The Palm Beach Post, dated July 26, 2006, details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual activity with minors. It describes police surveillance, evidence collection from his trash, and witness statements from girls who were allegedly recruited and paid for massages. The piece also highlights the conflict between the Palm Beach Police Chief and the State Attorney over the case's prosecution and notes Epstein's high-profile connections and legal team.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity