Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00014035.pdf
An email chain from December 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. They discuss an upcoming meeting involving 'Roy' which Lefkowitz states he will not attend, and arrange a phone call.
EFTA00013696.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2007, involving US Attorney Alex Acosta, attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis), and USAFLS staff. The emails discuss scheduling Jeffrey Epstein's 'change of plea' hearing, ultimately agreeing on November 20, 2007. The correspondence reveals a personal rapport between Acosta and Lefkowitz, noting a recent breakfast meeting, and discusses ensuring the date change does not impact when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
EFTA00013619.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
EFTA00013612.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
EFTA00013528.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing hearings. Lefkowitz asserts that the Court confirmed a date of January 4th for both the plea and sentencing on 'agreed-upon counts,' while USAFLS staff discuss conflicting dates (Dec 14/16) internally and await confirmation from Judge Davis.
EFTA00013515.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
EFTA00013503.pdf
An email chain from October 18, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (including Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The correspondence finalizes the date for Jeffrey Epstein to enter his guilty plea on November 20, 2007. The USAFLS specifically requests confirmation that postponing the plea date will not delay the start of Epstein's sentence.
EFTA00013499.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
DOJ-OGR-00000506.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that contains a repeated confidentiality notice from the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The notice states that the communication is confidential, potentially attorney-client privileged, and is the property of the firm. It instructs any unintended recipients to notify postmaster@kirkland.com and destroy all copies of the communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019410.jpg
This document is an email thread from March 7, 2011, in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz contacts Alexandra Wolfe regarding her inquiries about his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Lefkowitz asserts that previous press coverage has been defamatory and requests that Wolfe submit factual questions in writing to ensure accuracy. The top of the document includes fragments of questions regarding Epstein's sentencing leniency and his charitable work with Bill Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019408.jpg
An email correspondence from an attorney named Jay (associated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP) responding to an inquiry regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. The sender claims press coverage has been inaccurate and defamatory, requesting that specific factual questions be submitted for accurate responses. The document includes a redacted phone number and standard legal confidentiality disclaimers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020823.jpg
This document contains the footer section of an email or legal correspondence. It consists entirely of standard legal disclaimers regarding confidentiality, attorney-client privilege, and unauthorized use, specifically identifying the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The document bears a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020823).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031981.jpg
An email chain from March 2011 in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis LLP) responds to inquiries from Alexandra Wolfe regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Lefkowitz asserts that press coverage of Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory, requesting that Wolfe submit factual questions in writing. The document includes fragments of Wolfe's initial questions, which reference Epstein's charity initiatives with Bill Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013898.jpg
This document outlines strategies for creating products, specifically contrasting physical "hard" products with information products. It argues that information products are superior due to lower manufacturing costs, higher markups (20-50x), and difficulty of duplication compared to physical goods, citing successful examples like Tony Robbins' courses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021401.jpg
This document is the body of an email from an attorney named Jay (associated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP) regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney asserts that recent press coverage of Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory, offering to answer factual questions via email or phone (212-446-4970) to provide accurate responses. The document includes standard legal confidentiality disclaimers and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity