DAILY MAIL
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Media source |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of report |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Interview with Juror 'Scotty' | Unknown | View |
| 2022-01-26 | N/A | Publication of Daily Mail article interviewing juror 'Scotty'. | Online | View |
| 2022-01-07 | Media publication | The Daily Mail published a video of a portion of the interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Media publication | The Daily Mail published an article based on its interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-31 | N/A | Media inquiry received by DOJ regarding Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz allegations | View | |
| 2018-12-18 | N/A | Publication of article titled 'Second woman claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein "directed" her to ... | Daily Mail Website | View |
| 2015-11-02 | N/A | The Times reported that the Daily Mail had been leaked emails from Jeffrey Epstein to Parliament ... | UK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009029.jpg
This legal filing from February 2022 argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. It highlights that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their own histories of sexual assault during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The document cites press interviews and a New York Times article as evidence of these disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00009022.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details post-trial media interviews given by Juror No. 50 to Reuters and the Daily Mail. The text highlights that Juror No. 50 disclosed his own history of sexual abuse to the jury to help sway members who doubted the credibility of accusers Jane and Carolyn. Additionally, it notes that in a Daily Mail video (Exhibit 3), the juror explicitly denied being asked about his sexual abuse history in the jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009021.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, details statements from 'Juror No. 50' in the case involving Ms. Maxwell. The juror explains how his own experience with abuse influenced his perspective on the victims' credibility and how he shared this with the jury. It also describes a post-trial interview the juror gave to the Daily Mail, published on January 5, in which he called Ms. Maxwell a 'predator' and discussed the verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009003.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, focusing on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during jury selection and later gave interviews to media outlets like The Independent, Daily Mail, and Reuters. The document also notes that a second juror disclosed during deliberations that they had been a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00010582.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on June 22, 2022, argues against the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell's) complaints regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The prosecution asserts that her claims of abuse are unfounded, as determined by a BOP investigation, and are part of a pattern of dishonesty aimed at garnering public sympathy, citing a November 2021 Daily Mail article as a previous example of this tactic.
DOJ-OGR-00010341.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court ruling filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is addressing the Defendant's claim for a new trial based on 'Juror 50' providing false answers regarding his history of sexual abuse on a jury questionnaire. The Judge concludes that Juror 50's inaccurate answers were inadvertent rather than intentional perjury, citing a Daily Mail interview with Laura Collins where the juror appeared genuinely surprised to learn about the specific question he missed.
DOJ-OGR-00009862.jpg
This document is a printed Daily Mail article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It covers two main topics: an interview with a juror named 'Scotty' detailing the deliberations and voting splits in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, and a separate legal hearing where Judge Kaplan appeared dismissive of Prince Andrew's lawyer's attempts to use a 2009 Epstein settlement to dismiss a civil suit by Virginia Roberts. The document highlights specific vote counts for the Maxwell charges and Judge Kaplan's skepticism toward Prince Andrew's defense arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009809.jpg
This document is page 9 (filed as page 11 of 49) of a government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It analyzes post-trial media interviews given by 'Juror 50' to Reuters and The Independent regarding his failure to disclose his own sexual abuse history on the jury questionnaire. The text argues that despite this omission, Juror 50 remained impartial, citing his skeptical approach to evidence and specific reasons for convicting on some counts while acquitting on others (specifically regarding victim 'Jane').
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 642) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, specifically highlighting that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their personal histories of sexual abuse during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The page references a New York Times article from January 5, 2022, and contains a significant redaction in the footnotes.
DOJ-OGR-00009713.jpg
This legal document describes interviews given by Juror No. 50 to Reuters and the Daily Mail following a trial. Juror No. 50 stated that his disclosure of being a past victim of sexual assault helped convince other jurors who doubted the credibility of accusers. The document also highlights a video from the Daily Mail interview where the juror denies being asked about his sexual abuse history on the jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009712.jpg
This legal document details the perspective of Juror No. 50 from the trial of Ms. Maxwell. The juror explains how his own experience as a victim of abuse informed his view that the victims' delayed disclosure and continued contact with Maxwell and Epstein were irrelevant to their credibility. The document also references a post-trial interview with the Daily Mail on January 5, where the juror called Maxwell a 'predator' and described how he helped fellow jurors understand traumatic memory.
DOJ-OGR-00009650.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated March 1, 2022, detailing the questioning of an individual about their answers on a jury questionnaire. The questioning focuses on their responses regarding impartiality (Question 41) and personal history with sexual abuse (Question 48), and highlights inconsistencies between their questionnaire answers and statements made in subsequent interviews with reporters from Reuters and the Daily Mail.
DOJ-OGR-00009639.jpg
This document is a legal filing dated March 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case, given the context of juror misconduct allegations). It outlines proposed questions the defense wants the Court to ask 'Juror 50' to determine if the juror lied on their questionnaire regarding a history of sexual abuse. The filing cites media reports from The Independent and the Daily Mail where the juror allegedly admitted to being a victim of childhood sexual abuse, contradicting their jury questionnaire answers.
DOJ-OGR-00020050.jpg
This is page 30 of a defense filing (likely a bail application) dated December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that despite the government's initial claims of 'strong' evidence backed by flight logs and diaries, the 1.2 million pages of discovery produced so far contain no meaningful corroboration of the charges. The defense emphasizes that the produced documents largely date from the 2000s and 2010s, rather than the 1994-1997 period charged in the indictment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022047.jpg
This document is a scan of pages 240 and the subsequent page from a book by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text contrasts the massive media coverage of Prince Andrew's scandals (specifically regarding a 'gun smuggler') against the backdrop of the 2011 Japan earthquake. The second page begins a section on Alan Dershowitz, detailing a legal motion filed in early 2008 by a lawyer named Brad (likely Brad Edwards) on behalf of two unnamed women, accusing Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's trafficking activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026583.jpg
This document is an annotated screenshot of a Google search results page for 'Jeffrey Epstein' from early 2013, prepared by a reputation management professional. The annotations track the ranking movements of various web pages compared to a January 25th benchmark, explicitly mentioning 'linkbuilding' efforts to promote Epstein's foundations and suppress negative news articles, including one involving Prince Andrew. The document originated from the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020662.jpg
This is a private and confidential legal letter from the law firm Mishcon de Reya, representing Alan Dershowitz, sent to the Daily Mail on December 21, 2018. The letter addresses an article published on December 18, 2018, which details allegations by a woman named Ransome that Jeffrey Epstein directed her to have sex with Dershowitz. The letter characterizes these statements as extremely serious and highly defamatory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.jpg
An email dated January 26, 2018, from Richard Kahn of HBRK Associates Inc. to Jeffrey E. (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The email contains a link to a Daily Mail article about Nikki Haley denying rumors of an affair with Donald Trump. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017970.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in 2019. It details Virginia Roberts' (Giuffre) recollections of 2007, including intimidating calls from Epstein and Maxwell, and her skepticism regarding FBI agents Slater and Kuyrkendall, whom she feared were Epstein associates. The text also covers her 2011 public accusations against Prince Andrew and her 2015 affidavit implicating Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027695.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log between 'jee' (associated with email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. Spanning May 7-8, 2019, the conversation includes a personal comment ('You were strong , I was beat') and the sharing of news links regarding Robert Kraft's legal issues and the Iran nuclear deal. The document is stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027695.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027616.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged on March 28, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on political analysis, specifically comparing the Mueller Report to the SDNY investigations, with Epstein calling SDNY 'the punch' and Mueller 'the head fake.' Epstein also compliments the redacted individual on a recent appearance on Anderson Cooper's program.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029020.jpg
An email thread from November 10, 2016, involving Jeffrey Epstein and likely Renata Bolotova. Epstein shares a Daily Mail article link debunking a story about a woman claiming she was assaulted by Donald Trump and Epstein at a sex party. Bolotova responds, mentioning she tried to call him and expressing frustration that 'they bringing this bullshit up again.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029018.jpg
An email exchange dated November 10, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E. / jeevacation@gmail.com) and Deepak Chopra. Epstein sends a Daily Mail link regarding a 'fabricated' story involving sexual assault allegations against himself and Donald Trump. Chopra replies asking, 'Did she also drop civil case against you?'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029774.jpg
This document appears to be a diary entry or social report written by an industry insider during the 2011 Oscar season. It details the intense campaigning between 'The King's Speech' (backed by Harvey Weinstein) and 'The Social Network', culminating in a trip to Los Angeles where the author stays at the Beverly Hills Hotel and attends a high-profile party at Arianna Huffington's home attended by major tech and media moguls including Jeff Bezos, Eric Schmidt, and Bob Iger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029550.jpg
This document is a printout of Internet search results for 'Jeffrey Epstein' and related terms, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. The results include news articles from Forbes (debating his billionaire status) and the NY Post (regarding his post-jail return to NYC in 2011), as well as links to his foundation and unrelated individuals with similar names (a venture partner and a doctor). The snippet text highlights his connections to high-profile figures like Leslie Wexner, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Donald Trump.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity